[Roll] Intend for draft-tripathi-roll-reactive-applicability

Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> Mon, 06 January 2014 18:10 UTC

Return-Path: <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA7D1AE058 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 10:10:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.377
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.377 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZWtPFTgkCIoT for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 10:10:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE7B61AE068 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 10:10:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id z2so3148072wiv.12 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 10:10:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=wRJLzLar8/zKvsmOJqDRztFiabL0P2uXFZMTvNQuaSU=; b=bBPuvtFThHvYPsGsdVBpmgU7Z638edwXUABqy/L3WhsMBQS6kIqVqkSpxXOCRvS5Eb 4a3MkMQAzbhgXYHZ/y18oB7M5bbnbVrcysECV1VEIPOLejQd6Nq3n+3m8VUpOsgoOHew 9zp0YtBMV9F79pCkBcSJt2y1M3TDfKYbxfYb8qntfIWvFnuFGW8YQwmOU0Xnl9jq1vtu F+4fe2ffEe1kbZRBi3G8zHUpJmi37GoHC/PjcQyuDYECjqg2TMmCdIb3yONKF0/0RM6K 1MunEqjFIU8tF1NYQVHnB1xM7o63+eewDxc+1BoviflQYpDp+dNi4/vKTpCusVC1blbh JRXQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.222.38 with SMTP id qj6mr2502974wjc.66.1389031844768; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 10:10:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.44.144 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 10:10:44 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:10:44 -0200
Message-ID: <CAP+sJUfBoD_L1o2W4viAdn4DayfbksbZPNB5ezujDbEtojps=A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
To: jt369@drexel.edu, jau@coe.drexel.edu, c.chauvenet@watteco.com, JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1b73ab0720704ef512d81
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, roll <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: [Roll] Intend for draft-tripathi-roll-reactive-applicability
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 18:10:55 -0000

*Hi,Thanks for this draft,
https://ietf.org/doc/draft-tripathi-roll-reactive-applicability/
<https://ietf.org/doc/draft-tripathi-roll-reactive-applicability/>AbstractThis
document describes serious issues and shortcomings regarding the use of
reactive routing protocols in low power and lossy networks(LLNs). Routing
requirements for various LLN deployments are discussed in order to judge
how reactive routing may or may notadhere to the necessary criteria.We
would like to know please,  how is the intend for this document? how this
draft would be aligned with roll charter?, should we re-chartering?*

*Thank you in advance,*

Ines Robles