[Roll] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7774 (5057)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 06 November 2017 20:41 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0944F13FBC5; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 12:41:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b9UZbOfbaQmE; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 12:41:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9C1F13FB8B; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 12:41:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 8FB98B81A3E; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 12:40:54 -0800 (PST)
To: jim.list@hotmail.com, yusuke.doi@toshiba.co.jp, matthew.gillmore@itron.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: aretana.ietf@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, roll@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20171106204054.8FB98B81A3E@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 12:40:54 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/mhKHQUEwWBGCzE7vEXQXjZJMdSE>
Subject: [Roll] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7774 (5057)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 20:41:09 -0000
The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC7774, "Multicast Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (MPL) Parameter Configuration Option for DHCPv6". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5057 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Technical Reported by: James K. <jim.list@hotmail.com> Date Reported: 2017-06-29 Held by: Alvaro Retana (IESG) Section: 2.1 Original Text ------------- DM_IMAX (unsigned 8-bit integer): DATA_MESSAGE_IMAX. The actual maximum timeout is described as a number of doublings of DATA_MESSAGE_IMIN, as described in [RFC6206], Section 4.1. 0 and 0xff are reserved and MUST NOT be used. Corrected Text -------------- DM_IMAX (unsigned 8-bit integer): DATA_MESSAGE_IMAX. The actual maximum timeout is described as a number of doublings of DATA_MESSAGE_IMIN, as described in [RFC6206], Section 4.1. 0xff is reserved and MUST NOT be used. Notes ----- RFC6206 The maximum interval size, Imax, is described as a number of doublings of the minimum interval size. RFC7731 DATA_MESSAGE_IMAX - The maximum Trickle timer interval, as defined in [RFC6206], for MPL Data Message transmissions. DATA_MESSAGE_IMAX has a default value equal to DATA_MESSAGE_IMIN. also The default MPL parameters specify a forwarding strategy that utilizes both proactive and reactive techniques. Using these default values, an MPL Forwarder proactively transmits any new MPL Data Messages it receives and then uses MPL Control Messages to trigger additional MPL Data Message retransmissions where message drops are detected. Setting DATA_MESSAGE_IMAX to the same value as DATA_MESSAGE_IMIN in this case is acceptable, since subsequent MPL Data Message retransmissions are triggered by MPL Control Messages, where CONTROL_MESSAGE_IMAX is greater than CONTROL_MESSAGE_IMIN. For DATA_MESSAGE_IMAX == DATA_MESSAGE_IMIN implies DM_IMAX=0. 0 is a valid value for DM_IMAX. ===== [Alvaro Retana] The pointer to rfc7731 seems to indicate that the description for is incorrect. However, this document uses Normative language to define the DM_IMAX parameter. I am then not marking this report as Verified, but as "Hold for Document Update", which means that when this document is updated, the validity should be considered then. [1] [1] https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/errata-processing.html -------------------------------------- RFC7774 (draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration-08) -------------------------------------- Title : Multicast Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (MPL) Parameter Configuration Option for DHCPv6 Publication Date : March 2016 Author(s) : Y. Doi, M. Gillmore Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Roll] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7774 … RFC Errata System