Re: [Roll] [roll] #128: Trickle multicast could be considered in other applications?

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 29 July 2013 08:13 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDA921F9DFB for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 01:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.476
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.476 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.123, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8CE0HGkk2lM3 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 01:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3::184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FFE21F9808 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 01:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD2920187; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 05:18:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id BEA9663A88; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 04:11:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9851963A7C; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 04:11:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: roll@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <082.a3c6d181235e95142a4efbdf979fe23b@trac.tools.ietf.org>
References: <067.081907fd6195c3034e6e8c71a7eb4a93@trac.tools.ietf.org> <082.a3c6d181235e95142a4efbdf979fe23b@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 04:11:35 -0400
Message-ID: <12710.1375085495@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Cc: mariainesrobles@gmail.com, johui@cisco.com, rdroms@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [Roll] [roll] #128: Trickle multicast could be considered in other applications?
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 08:13:11 -0000

roll issue tracker <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org> wrote:
    > Whether or not MPL is contained at the LBR is a deployment decision.
    > Personally, I think it should be, and other multicast forwarding should be
    > used in non-lossy networks.

...

    > These issues should be addressed in the Applicability statement.

is there any disagreement here?


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/