IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] [6lo] WGLC for draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-03

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Wed, 13 August 2014 19:11 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D931A0489 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 12:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.169
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.169 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I9EFqoQp9eaK for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 12:11:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 842431A047D for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 12:11:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=964; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1407957070; x=1409166670; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=OOwtFrY5O16EmOfirmiajTzc+0jwEVFmEjgHUd+ZFBk=; b=AwoxoG+J0KCDYZ37oObjodd0qeU5kBdgAurIjvVzPej/yyNIVAdcRYAU /lIR3ggCP+9ATjK3eK4f3mvwzfE5MI82JTFCqY7YE/OZA0zGM/1lr1UKN mVDmg9HjmQ3fZ3hbp5XTcwQZJF/SKUwvjtlkbhGd3dwnaJ9V2HGKuAWZA 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhAFACC361OtJV2T/2dsb2JhbABagw1SV80kCodIAYEWFneEAwEBAQMBAQEBaxALAgEIGC4nCyUCBBOIOggNxwcTBI57AQEcOoMvgR0FimOGOosclH6DXGyBDw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,857,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="69000483"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Aug 2014 19:11:09 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7DJB7Ga028548 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 19:11:07 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.1.56]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 14:11:07 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] [6lo] WGLC for draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-03
Thread-Index: AQHPtyoH9NpmEOvPPUCuS34Wv0nHR5vO5laX
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 19:11:06 +0000
Message-ID: <181D3791-227B-44D7-9368-E69CEAD03A52@cisco.com>
References: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD842D189A1@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <406B5D64-4F0E-4E71-BC60-A113FB367652@gmail.com> <46112F69-05F0-4E50-A808-287B06AE8E5F@cs.stanford.edu> <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD842D1A9FA@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <057EC9C6-07FF-409B-A3BC-3348A5F43AB3@gmail.com> <53E534E8.4050304@gmail.com> <F7618DE0-7217-46C2-93A1-CE050085E7AB@employees.org> <53E926EB.9000505@gmail.com> <CAP+sJUfDyNa=t=+C=QXy8MmvG9rAUxA0mTsXL7xSWAeLUR1qcQ@mail.gmail.com> <53EAA58D.4060401@gmail.com> <4C8FA2D5-7FD5-40A0-9D98-081BEC6A0480@tzi.org> <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD842D3BED8@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>, <6454DDD1-9A3F-4F46-9493-7307BEC01F4D@cs.stanford.edu>
In-Reply-To: <6454DDD1-9A3F-4F46-9493-7307BEC01F4D@cs.stanford.edu>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/nBa5DP9dtgF1jw24NZXhXeA1FdY
Subject: Re: [Roll] [6lo] WGLC for draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-03
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 19:11:14 -0000

Phil, is this your complete mail?

Pascal

> Le 13 août 2014 à 21:08, "Philip Levis" <pal@cs.stanford.edu> a écrit :
> 
>> On Aug 13, 2014, at 9:48 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
>> 
>> If this draft is not adopted, the flow label from LLN will probably stay all zeroes as it is today and the goal of 6437 will not be achieved.
> 
> Pascal, I'm trying to reconcile your claim that the goal of 6437 is to allow enclosed networks to use the flow label with Brian's statement
> 
>> Actually that's why I don't want to see a formal
>> update to 6437, because the only rational update would be to allow
>> any closed domain to invent its own usage. We had that argument at
>> length during the development of 6437, and decided against it.
> 
> Phil
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email