[Roll] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-13: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-13: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work put into this document.

Carles Gomez has done a Last Call IoT directorate review at
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-directorate/_UG_q8yutQU28ldYK1cdySTQoNs
and had a couple of nits and comments that were discussed and implemented.
Thank you Carles for the review and thank you Pascal for updating the document
accordingly.

I have only one comment/suggestion below.

I hope that this helps to improve the document,

Regards,

-éric

-- Section 5  --
I find this text confusing at first read "adding nodes that do not support
[RFC8138] after a roll back may be problematic if the roll back did not fully
complete" I had to read section 5.3 to fully understand it.

Should something like ", the network operator must ensure that the roll back
operation is completed before adding nodes that do not support RFC 8138" be
easier to understand ?