IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6550 (3895)

Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> Fri, 21 February 2014 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F6A1A0316 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 06:49:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.376
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.376 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_BIG_TO_CC=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RQu5Ll7212uk for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 06:49:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vc0-x22c.google.com (mail-vc0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2191A02D0 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 06:49:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id lf12so3342135vcb.31 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 06:49:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=LIn/g+sc6W/2zRYH5sbU5lBte1hMFpj2xOm5BOYK2UA=; b=F9cfCVKCnyFti42iB6qnESKd3XWnvIygCGImza9BGrPeEnmpDVw+jq7mxQgLJ/YSjJ +eNBuCE/DhJXMz+wdhJhylFWiYFKtKvx+iVUCGqraC5mD01vxlDAeULNqJWBk+EQVl6r GsvWyCUYNfkxEjtBgm33TBihal8H4tLvi6Y7kWKUJgKb0hH2VZsr7hxrb/vpGi1ArYTX RLli1nAXW28Wy0P3UKZdcYgSvY+5ZhTFYzP+z5aD3zloLZThEC/lwG6JBV2IxYqgOUCT ixYnObNIP/ZXtaWOdMPEKoQmDRiUYZVbEcFFzuLVZQuDv8EkidSjQUiE1fuk8pDSKKTC 6xwA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.221.46.65 with SMTP id un1mr4967889vcb.67.1392994147133; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 06:49:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.49.68 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 06:49:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20140217092028.3B7037FC2C9@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20140217092028.3B7037FC2C9@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:49:07 -0300
Message-ID: <CAP+sJUfQDJzU_8XtJnGL7jVnj_FUGdi7sCeZqqBvWnA-cm7yrQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11339386506e0f04f2ebb960"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/njCV18HDJBBnQpGdqvTWBeru38E
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 07:19:23 -0800
Cc: kpister@dustnetworks.com, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, roll <roll@ietf.org>, jhui@archrock.com, lei.mou.uu@gmail.com, kelsey@ember.com
Subject: Re: [Roll] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6550 (3895)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:49:13 -0000

Hello,

Yes, it is a typo.

Thanks Lei Mou for report it.

Thanks and Regards,

Michael & Ines.



2014-02-17 6:20 GMT-03:00 RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6550,
> "RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6550&eid=3895
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Lei Mou <lei.mou.uu@gmail.com>
>
> Section: 9.8
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> 1.  The DODAG Parent Address subfield of a Transmit Information
>     option MUST be empty.
>
> 5. ...
>
>    When a storing node generates a DAO, it uses the stored state of DAOs
>    it has received to produce a set of RPL Target options and their
>    associated Transmit Information options.
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> 1.  The DODAG Parent Address subfield of a Transit Information
>     option MUST be empty.
>
> 5. ...
>
>    When a storing node generates a DAO, it uses the stored state of DAOs
>    it has received to produce a set of RPL Target options and their
>    associated Transit Information options.
>
> Notes
> -----
> There is no "Transmit Information option", It should be Transit
> Information option. I believe it's quite possible caused by a typo.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6550 (draft-ietf-roll-rpl-19)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy
> Networks
> Publication Date    : March 2012
> Author(s)           : T. Winter, Ed., P. Thubert, Ed., A. Brandt, J. Hui,
> R. Kelsey, P. Levis, K. Pister, R. Struik, JP. Vasseur, R. Alexander
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email