Re: [Roll] RPL-Unaware-Leaf or RPL-Unaware Leaf ?
"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Wed, 16 December 2020 08:17 UTC
Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF0F43A1102
for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 00:17:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001,
USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=cisco.com header.b=QkCWX4PL;
dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=OLNxCNdd
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id K-B3oVqRSjlE for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 16 Dec 2020 00:17:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D5223A10FC
for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 00:17:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;
d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1418; q=dns/txt; s=iport;
t=1608106657; x=1609316257;
h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:
content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
bh=8h/Mu4+uOsEgXu4hsG0EzDsIP+4mZgf7w6N9lIPqgHg=;
b=QkCWX4PLJn2VgPWnZzRQtogTIWxsPmN+pBkVWG2Wj+33WP2SSVgIyNtX
hkjEGfeMC2aM0yADy2FbjPQPma4QYNrMIQcrzhQsQfXdAWRNMMKUQ7B8x
H8Rul+Ptg1NTG4FSArtPp3CtLXTTLKTPI787Mp07/hY+gs9mv1ehH9ih2 8=;
X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AMCACiwNlf/4sNJK1iHQEBAQEJARIBBQUBQIFPgVJRB?=
=?us-ascii?q?3VbLy6IBwONWAORA4gHgUKBEQNUCwEBAQ0BARgLCgIEAQGESgKBcAIlOBMCA?=
=?us-ascii?q?wEBAQMCAwEBAQEFAQEBAgEGBHGFYQyFcgEBAQEDAQEQLgEBLAwLBAIBCBEEA?=
=?us-ascii?q?QEBLicLHQgCBBMIGoMFglUDLgEOoSICgTyIaXSBNIMEAQEFhRUYghADBoE4g?=
=?us-ascii?q?nWKLyYbgUE/gVSCVj6CXQEBAoEjPINIgiyBaV5kU1o8eQxFjxyMPZweCoJ0k?=
=?us-ascii?q?w+IXqI9tS0CBAIEBQIOAQEFgW0jgVdwFTuCaVAXAg2OIYNxhRSFRHQCNQIGA?=
=?us-ascii?q?QkBAQMJfIlrAQE?=
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AQdusDRCi3Xt7TgkR29ZOUyQJPHJ1sqjoPgMT9p?=
=?us-ascii?q?ssgq5PdaLm5Zn5IUjD/qw01g3IUJnVrfVehLmev6PhXDkG5pCM+DAHfYdXXh?=
=?us-ascii?q?AIwcMRg0Q7AcGDBEG6SZyibyEzEMlYElMw+Xa9PBtUFdrwIVrIrS764TsbAB?=
=?us-ascii?q?6qMw1zK6z8EZLTiMLi0ee09tXTbgxEiSD7b6l1KUC9rB7asY8dho4xJw=3D=?=
=?us-ascii?q?3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,423,1599523200"; d="scan'208";a="610488799"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139])
by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA;
16 Dec 2020 08:17:36 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.12])
by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0BG8HaWq024321
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL)
for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 08:17:36 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com
(173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2;
Wed, 16 Dec 2020 02:17:35 -0600
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com
(173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2;
Wed, 16 Dec 2020 02:17:35 -0600
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by
xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(TLS) id
15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 03:17:35 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none;
b=Z68XH6z8hk4sBJcalEV0lI/Zsz8QfF9ucNmpo/CIT52LO5KdEv35hSN4M9O0QMeq9Ueoheb7LoaKpesLTnOTRHdvEL5zSSLaZTCmFHUxJR4YXcij8WMjxjt+7jl5lPboDpWCFdswqinMrbF8GZCqzO3Yqj8PQcEurZSl4itHUnufaV9+RU3QvsPvbU+J5aStsLag4WuQvkFdlWYPo1KwshTyKFsPkQ7VJIVBKw+lrUgpN/qYH/f1EeIdBiZnOz8ib32oPQdhLHaxlQGhDxPy5XSNbPtAk1ltLr5A5n5/WwaxISdy3uKieplZVwc3tzHCgt/HfJxf8WsTFoaLzBZPtQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;
s=arcselector9901;
h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;
bh=+TaIlammZklTdtaQIXHkHCU8nmy9SSH29JXoMwHfAWY=;
b=lqFmHEaX9HnVertRX8qi/PRY0NdlIH9K9fbkQu6uNj2HOXcGgyJ5imoarU5uzo8GZBt5jUqOUNDnEbo74j+JKbA+ekqB+xofMIvcQDp1M2Dxlbx9Vm77baP4BfjsqXpGzQBPMlLGjwEd+aIFa7ztuQiMFvCgGJ63aVWFENfYXP+D7iRyQ3g+oefakGEXJihIPfD4CajZRR2At4kvsCNoqjB1pH5nE9Woxsf8jY8ucfGbh2i0i6enedHm+DtII4hU2j2vZSAyKtF7peNUsf6p8aCx/EQhAZBr0i7Jdw5IJe3qSEJFn2A9sqr1/oS9JvtlhEkS+tfYEU9kpBRb9xo2gg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass
smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com;
dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com;
s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com;
h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;
bh=+TaIlammZklTdtaQIXHkHCU8nmy9SSH29JXoMwHfAWY=;
b=OLNxCNddTzAgO0PGzRwysOujMNuUOqmTIIw/I8D6EifGy8JhV5/WEvX46pQaVVkasy5FgpNI3bQgyhP4CQIpXHouh05/rboJJqPPIHS9zx2GgtVPVacB8JoyOISHUON7DRY0xkTGhlKos/gQqCA7fZJ+j36e68Eo+JaT5mlPBW4=
Received: from CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:91::20)
by CO1PR11MB5156.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:95::9) with
Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3654.12; Wed, 16 Dec
2020 08:17:34 +0000
Received: from CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
([fe80::499:4510:59d6:8f61]) by CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
([fe80::499:4510:59d6:8f61%4]) with mapi id 15.20.3654.020; Wed, 16 Dec 2020
08:17:34 +0000
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] RPL-Unaware-Leaf or RPL-Unaware Leaf ?
Thread-Index: AQHW0lH9XpEXX1/BtkewvObEpkbF26n3A8+VgAHAOKuAAJ0/cA==
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 08:17:08 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 08:16:25 +0000
Message-ID: <CO1PR11MB48810B55FB5A9ED5BF08C5DDD8C50@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CO1PR11MB48818A537C3EA3FC85E73C0BD8C70@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
<161a2e64-0325-5a22-ce1d-28a58888aaed@saloits.com>
<0CF0DCA8-FCAE-435B-9C23-CC00DE80F42E@cisco.com> <29100.1607994514@localhost>
<d5ce6223-b208-b92b-b877-13cc49623f32@saloits.com>
In-Reply-To: <d5ce6223-b208-b92b-b877-13cc49623f32@saloits.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed)
header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2a01:cb1d:4ec:2200:80f0:4acd:dde0:b36f]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: bc18a881-27d0-4a40-00fe-08d8a19b0a9e
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CO1PR11MB5156:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CO1PR11MB51567F81B53AF855A35E5C89D8C50@CO1PR11MB5156.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: CQWBMmVDWODgHvbTg5GKR9WlYmidwRQNauQD5lyzrWs+kKB9CJT4W+gFNYVxpqHB/+iDNtF3tcexMx0a/uwJUR0vOZHk3+6JCrOsYMkOSdLA817+dgSgnT2S13dvhTq7AfGEzMdoilHSBcsHcqet+qQgt6hy6jckdRKLJmvW8eL920O1hTEDWc59U1qCwC43wRA6CLFunXs02Anf2v7AXPvQJK08CipCLKW0+VmVJnXP2QXDUzYFz8tF6gEqBZdJWf64Ly2kbAjEvtjSqOY4Xm4yFpGtlSwm4eR0ZRKmgcyyfJEgoERjldYhxMHR7uawUGA9RC5M4b1h/w98U/ZYvzxu0cfD9vZJtZhA6U2l+YufhPPoe0fovBwomgQrhpapPHwk1fBJrHsGsRIrPn+/xg==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:;
IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM;
H:CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE;
SFS:(396003)(346002)(366004)(39860400002)(376002)(136003)(316002)(478600001)(86362001)(83380400001)(71200400001)(186003)(5660300002)(55016002)(76116006)(33656002)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(966005)(66476007)(8676002)(9686003)(66946007)(53546011)(6916009)(52536014)(6666004)(2906002)(6506007)(7696005)(8936002)(66574015);
DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: =?iso-8859-1?Q?HiRlLUJrgmq/wKi0+hFtvCJ4K6p4ktWDpZC4juFOcCGi59yrM0fUej9w0/?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?OxM2oHAYbPEu6sycPdwwA/52vLqrpwDsONns75lJoFb7Gaa85TIn83ZvPl?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?BVLWQaDj90GB1dQwohTehuwWjPGLkkLe9ZQmqfBHCiup459dRoZnuNz+jK?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?q2oJxTo6nhYxxLg06pn2P7lgfb+ymLTDSHtmO7wKB5O97G5qkf5fhvclbd?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?gcXUKKlSIM+b42najOHN97SfQj/DaTRbG//C3l7ieWEvdaLJbOgPEjQqmh?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?SrOtE/qvqOf+QlUXUqWVeFGmwFMS8lky1tQBfBPkXh6aWy6rTNrrdkdAj4?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?kjTU1xwG8vz97zPSEMINnfjHMT0Hn3bmEJQNsGL9BKdP09BEHv5Lujz6cw?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?0mTrQ1Z+74pUeOWIlzmTSbKQve2Ea8tHJkLJ3WhO1RAbH/q2E96bzluZj2?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?68YBe8WSekxVIRZWASKEz3aw5tJLkFvOALX7lRCDNbqjw6t8BnQVDmPdRf?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?ZimrJV1HjNf4EtfZNDJT9ASWVJc+a+oXSiBPahJe5MfYc5tCBBXkd1bDsI?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?43px0Mp+gXFQxSEXeLicZMWwLG+noCXpjV3RkyejrGXZ8vxdFNrvVauDyo?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?8J77LGOYXSpvf42syYqzxmgfKLxB8LBej3Au615ccNExOkg+4IiMka0I+T?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?bw/e0TLZs4yz4MqKrLhbIBlIxY+yapN8ID6NvyP/zcBUFZkkQy7QfFUAW4?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?o7NUxBtWGSwpO/xBKIJa3yhkZYLiUiVYO6rqI1WR2YZDPTEqNltp1jNmdy?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?DhdSHF3U5nitiyfZRfLdDDRuYHbuzj8p08toE65Qi7JjmOQIiuAb0aAQ0O?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?3SjvvPHCwHDYNVAQzHYrtlZLrd9Wv/fkgX5MlE+KUojwoZu2GaIsaQfF+M?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?VlMxprJwnVE1TtaQJ3PVMLqwr+BnqsVir/mLJ6PexPuBg1hfzQgem13yJX?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?RCm9s/AXC8BdJktAAL2QEip9i1iKdiO4R1sZi82Uxzv9JMfT23KdnGPGUD?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?JwwnLFdxPM4YmFP4/n5Ie/FaA3SDwRMEo73Hdopk4Jwc?=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: bc18a881-27d0-4a40-00fe-08d8a19b0a9e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Dec 2020 08:17:34.2617 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: SFyy3p30MYJIe2IgnndilJThEuuirT1oeb9aw4HwaYCxrwGYXrwNmUzKsk4mOIUOPzf5imAIuALoI9aEUWUb2w==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO1PR11MB5156
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.12, xch-rcd-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-6.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/oyGsrJL7XhCzYOBUdjBscT2uAk8>
Subject: Re: [Roll] RPL-Unaware-Leaf or RPL-Unaware Leaf ?
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>,
<mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>,
<mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 08:17:39 -0000
Dear all I committed draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-25 with RPL-Unaware Leaf convention. Note that I also lowercased leaf, host and router throughout based on review comments. This needs to aligned in useofrplinfo, which seems to use pseudo-randomly the uppercased version. Note: I left Leaf uppercased only in the full " RPL-(Un)aware Leaf ". Still time to change but we want alignment. What do you all think? Pascal > -----Original Message----- > From: Roll <roll-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Timothy J. Salo > Sent: mardi 15 décembre 2020 23:48 > To: roll@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Roll] RPL-Unaware-Leaf or RPL-Unaware Leaf ? > > On 12/14/2020 7:08 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > > Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\) <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > > Ines, do we agree to change both drafts to say RPL-(un)aware Leaf|node > > > ? > > > > >> Another of the hyphenation rules is: > > >> > > >> o Use a hyphen to avoid confusion. > > > > I prefer this rule, and to leave it as "RPL-unware-leaf" > > I assume an editor will catch this and change it to RPL-unaware leaf. > > In my view, "RPL-unaware leaf" is grammatically correct and unambiguous. > > -tjs > > _______________________________________________ > Roll mailing list > Roll@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
- [Roll] RPL-Unaware-Leaf or RPL-Unaware Leaf ? Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] RPL-Unaware-Leaf or RPL-Unaware Leaf ? Timothy J. Salo
- Re: [Roll] RPL-Unaware-Leaf or RPL-Unaware Leaf ? Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] RPL-Unaware-Leaf or RPL-Unaware Leaf ? Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] RPL-Unaware-Leaf or RPL-Unaware Leaf ? Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] RPL-Unaware-Leaf or RPL-Unaware Leaf ? Timothy J. Salo
- Re: [Roll] RPL-Unaware-Leaf or RPL-Unaware Leaf ? Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] RPL-Unaware-Leaf or RPL-Unaware Leaf ? Michael Richardson