Re: [Roll] Call to confirm a rough consensus on RPL info

Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu> Wed, 22 October 2014 00:38 UTC

Return-Path: <twatteyne@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7131A88A7; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Njitel33pNpd; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22f.google.com (mail-pa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2C5D1A8841; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id kq14so2504041pab.6 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=axWZkA5iFh73t+DAO132LP2O8hacTNfk8NpuXNfUWuo=; b=yRxHrOX/VjTCVmfvQMwfJQ2gHJp23UEyZ0EeANO+/ELC9jkWP1xVv/2ErGvwXiexgc hWTudrZ6/SN9qU5AvcV4rGSpXOXjesJ2r/E5CmdTLY8GlyTU0hHDjPF+vHsDS5iVgEv3 vkXdVwDFnuAFu8Ih15bl82nmyqvNB47Kg8pr7/PNgK2xrvvroo0o0hiTA8C35LQzfPaB dQADN/QcQPHrHHgqoDJk9okJWp9+MML03l0vCGiOhR1MjIQoMvcvyKW0/AkfKDYkzR07 NZqcmaIOrDMiMHopkIJ2Ap1NRWQYns6sJlII2mNGMmbQ1V8b1ODj764iGW7AfcXm83dj pjgg==
X-Received: by 10.66.160.225 with SMTP id xn1mr15198780pab.24.1413938318399; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: twatteyne@gmail.com
Received: by 10.66.250.169 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMsDxWQKgRvY+4LmMEB9LWqNQDipCmeq8ot3aR=wJNedgstVnA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD842E1AEC5@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <CAMsDxWQKgRvY+4LmMEB9LWqNQDipCmeq8ot3aR=wJNedgstVnA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:38:18 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: cYjlX6zgW7wzoU_V5Cfv0E0o8o8
Message-ID: <CADJ9OA94sQESoqAb4uJHV5NML2FroSXk9QfjPBujAUXgsKQfqw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6d883a33e1e60505f82b9f
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/pb6sGfm78Bo8bKyHM6-njxqzUfg
Cc: "6lo-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <6lo-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>, "roll-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <roll-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "6tisch-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <6tisch-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Call to confirm a rough consensus on RPL info
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 00:38:40 -0000

+1 on the proposal.

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Xavier Vilajosana <
xvilajosana@eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote:

> All,
>
> I fully support that approach. Hope to contribute and make it happen as
> soon as possible.
>
> regards,
> Xavi
>
> 2014-10-15 8:32 GMT+02:00 Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>om>:
>
> Dear all:
>>
>> During the 6TiSCH bi-weekly virtual interim on Friday, we agreed that the
>> minimal I-D (draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal) must indicate the compression
>> method for the RPL Information (see RFC 6553), so as to ensure
>> interoperation between 6TiSCH devices.
>>
>> We discussed our options, basically either a 6lo approach or a Flow Label
>> approach. The rough consensus at the call was to try and focus on a 6lo
>> approach and evaluate where that leads us.
>>
>> Because this means that the minimal draft will have a normative reference
>> on a WIP I-D, we recognized that this approach may delay the publication of
>> the final RFC. Per IETF procedures, the minimal draft will be stalled in
>> the RFC editor queue in MISREF state until the 6lo work completes. So the
>> consensus was also to support the 6lo work so as to expedite it as much as
>> possible.
>>
>> The idea would be to republish a standard track draft-ietf-6lo- ASAP,
>> based on the existing proposals (which are rapidly converging); then, Xavi
>> would include a normative reference to that work in the minimal I-D before
>> its publication to IESG, which is scheduled in November (yes, this is
>> aggressive).
>>
>> This is a call to confirm the rough consensus on the ML, open till the
>> next interim call on October 24th. Please provide us with any relevant
>> comment (and participate to the 6lo discussions in the meantime!).
>>
>> If the result is positive:
>> - we plan to call for a 6lo WG doc adoption in Hawaii
>> - we are looking for an aggressive schedule to limit the impact on the
>> publication of the minimal RFC
>>
>> 6TiSCH may host the 6lo discussion so as to:
>> - benefit from the early morning schedule
>> - attract more 6TiSCH people to the discussion
>>
>> More the published minutes:
>> - Webex recording:
>> https://cisco.webex.com/ciscosales/lsr.php?RCID=36a3b7df06694258a3ac65bfc519212f
>> - Wiki: https://bitbucket.org/6tisch/meetings/wiki/141010_webex
>> - Slides:
>> https://bitbucket.org/6tisch/meetings/src/master/141010_webex/slides_141010_webex.ppt
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Pascal
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Roll mailing list
>> Roll@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>