IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Semantics of DAO ACK

Joakim Eriksson <joakime@sics.se> Thu, 15 October 2015 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <joakime@sics.se>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DFA1A88A1 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L8Ht9TQlTk77 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-f51.google.com (mail-lf0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C65311A6FA9 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lffv3 with SMTP id v3so37018002lff.0 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=Rkxk9hR5pKZrj43tD2mWpHoih5nYocbyPYlPQML5dak=; b=dCTZHF/PP8a7BgXMwHkGRogR4lDpDOnh9PRk/R72b0W0aASH0Fh5CaBsHLk3HOxISi eaKgODPaURBB5XurwJdtdy1OAIGZIWAyx6Aw0eLZyzHVLQyXD8RYjGEPKlwoMuPjjdst N0FB+qCkh1we4j7Oigut3yeUwSmr0s/H6WediRyAxkHroCq9cE2WnxoOcczl/Le91NAp 69WJ6DmLkldKMWsDVAFIPmchBSTn6lSNKOgyePy7fMDSuwNbF5gM8jYT3k1GFkFj7GPm PqXwZzEBa5taWc59jIXh24IQ58trVLjdvJCCL4blxx8M2EKDQRbxW5iw+2S5bpYtak5i tD+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlUzzkE2OHvGxWlgiHHkwXDd+6yVPQrpoJljsn35ZQRo06nZnPURdQx+9TVkdfU1GcM0b4J
X-Received: by 10.25.165.4 with SMTP id o4mr3450330lfe.4.1444928454081; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.102] (h31n15-sbg-a11.ias.bredband.telia.com. [195.67.245.31]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b140sm2208600lfe.23.2015.10.15.10.00.52 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.0 \(3094\))
From: Joakim Eriksson <joakime@sics.se>
In-Reply-To: <561FC4CD.4040508@fbk.eu>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:00:53 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3719B311-73DD-4526-AC2C-4871F2573963@sics.se>
References: <DB5PR01MB10807DAF503BBFF45787599C80420@DB5PR01MB1080.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> <6d21d0f86ab14ae7a99ff9fe6873b1fd@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <C885EE62-D889-4229-9CCB-B3CB540F5692@sics.se> <560AFDBB.8050505@gmail.com> <560B68B2.6030501@fbk.eu> <561FC22C.6000000@sandelman.ca> <561FC4CD.4040508@fbk.eu>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3094)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/psFZ53sZX_cq5KK-d8nCxXgT9Xk>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Semantics of DAO ACK
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:01:02 -0000

Hello,

I am planning to help out to write our DAO ACK experiences down in an RFC!

Best regards,
— Joakim

> On 15 Oct 2015, at 17:22, Csaba Kiraly <kiraly@fbk.eu> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 15/10/15 17:11, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 09/30/15 00:44, Csaba Kiraly wrote:
>>> What Cenk is saying sounds a reasonable hack, but the standard itself is in my opinion a bit underspecified for the semantics of DAO-ACK messages in several ways.
>> 
>> A document which updated RFC6550 would be welcome here.
> 
> I could extend my previous summary into a more proper document, but I have no experience with RFC writing, so I would prefer to team up with someone who is more knowledgeable in the writing style. Anyone willing to help?
> 
> Csaba
> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Roll mailing list
>> Roll@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email