[Roll] STRONG NUDGE: review draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 27 June 2014 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155421A03B4 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.532
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.532 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01, T_TVD_MIME_NO_HEADERS=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sd3Wdouehfgc for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B043C1ABB90 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE37200F7 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 13:56:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 1B0F264630; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 12:03:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056EF63AED for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 12:03:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: roll@ietf.org
X-Attribution: mcr
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 12:03:27 -0400
Message-ID: <24486.1403712207@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/pvPofpC5J_hbU3RDhXPfKpkaZbE
Subject: [Roll] STRONG NUDGE: review draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 18:02:41 -0000

The WG adopted:
    http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration/

in march.  There has been only minor discussion on this document, despite
there being a reasonable number of people who said they thought this was a
valuable addition to LLNs, and MPL.

The authors posted a few comments about a question I had: what happens to MPL
if the parameters are changed, and I think that I'm satisfied.

At this point, it's the WG job to read the document and post questions.
Even if the protocol is no interest to you, but you've read it, you could say
so. Clearly if you have an interest in the protocol, and in MPL, please review.

The chairs think that this document may be read for a WGLC, but we do not
think that there has been enough discussion for us to believe that the
document has been sufficiently read.

Please comment before IETF90 so we don't have to abandon the work!

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/