Re: [Roll] ROLL WGLCs and new tickets

Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 24 August 2018 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA73130DDE for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u3sT_8RwDClu for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x931.google.com (mail-ua1-x931.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::931]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 359B7130DD3 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x931.google.com with SMTP id y10-v6so5835340uao.4 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=IbO0faxGDzALr3Yi6BbIhJMFhTnmvyyicgpOI99e2+U=; b=iaU+R6RG4ilP+gjVyzoAba4cxy12OZeET7uE4g+h/4HNeGCDhM6nqD7EZGrD1oYMDr DakRewWg99GUF8Tfd9NfWlPPi+l55ZoMJCVfe1xdDKgC2Hwxrc6iixxgswshhcZzGOSr z7E6c2ToOML7fAAX4yf08z9MCXAC4JLYZvBfrEX2I9D4BXPCrYTpFXja+W/06nv3f0Qb 3FlPLPCX1rVtcdjOUyRSOIDy+72nrJmezaoJsCOOF78MynETqBc4d1QUo6bWvb2iOCH3 IFB5JFaLSSUVZ8SlUAo6KNx08DqCqZHCFAQniU2nhxejNTg/vCZK3dwQkIO56jx19p9m ZYqw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=IbO0faxGDzALr3Yi6BbIhJMFhTnmvyyicgpOI99e2+U=; b=HOmymbYB80esZbKXrxj8SKInQURon2gjPjnruKpQIBOVRCXJiP+5JI+rfInGPK9GcJ dYzeIF0DMbfCU3SrgS0ddP/Yoy+400uRSml3Sm4Ae4N2ANMbl+HIL8ZLWJn038MVcGfn qb/RwwlGZHV/f1mGl7Di13R2HpSSzry4uaPOfJqMeAw4XpQnqN/+9s6NlwzbUyJQWw0m FpXiaIxBzc8Y9pbSNhjp7Cd1BMR0vr5zzVjmtJ8LNMugVwO618om0FD54MX8EUWUIYdU nx3sFKEBY5iiMbIwuVnY2ZLz0Zlz4GZaA1qxWck3hGKcRQWyfDrjZNys5sVPUneoFPBa nckA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51DL9c21kiJ5eZIWb7DCsqCjYnsQQInQ/Y6rkmhBLwdQ4mYuDLNq u2JHl9bAO9GFbJd6eC/UHSXqLXmyn/3H+nlfT5IpXQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vda7jGACVT2uLYU+waLPkHyqP6XGfGv5X50mGxPDYhTGNf4/vb5rP7nAc3z1KkQGlUslo6ztd+H6lylvdN+nsKo=
X-Received: by 2002:a9f:2b87:: with SMTP id y7-v6mr1688721uai.109.1535131091931; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAP+sJUdnS2Stv+-YsqvOrdc=s1jc_0E+UWKU=ErD1w+n9QaQOA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP+sJUdnS2Stv+-YsqvOrdc=s1jc_0E+UWKU=ErD1w+n9QaQOA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 22:48:00 +0530
Message-ID: <CAO0Djp2VFLAnD=MKPeaASZ587LRS+apbQLP+oJZG6u1PsMq+Bw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006b1c260574318faa"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/q6hXhJaHosynnoKQMAMH8oM92-E>
Subject: Re: [Roll] ROLL WGLCs and new tickets
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 17:18:15 -0000

Hello All,

For efficient NPDAO we have updated the text based on Remy's comments.
Thank you Remy.

For RPL-Observations, we have added a section which describes Motivation
for this draft and clearly mentions that the draft is not intended for RFC
track but as WG discussion track.

Regards,
Rahul

On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 at 15:18, Ines Robles <mariainesrobles=
40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Thank you very much for your reviews on the required drafts.
>
> So far we have:
>
> - For WGLC for draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-03:  to add corrections by
> this thread:
> https://www.ietf..org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg10568.html
> <https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg10568.html>
>
> - For for draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-04: to add corrections by this thread:
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg10570.html
>
> - WG Call for adoption: RPL-Observations. => Adopt this document.
> Could the authors please submit a new ietf draft with some text in the
> introduction explaining that this is a WG informational document, that is
> not intended for RFC track but as WG discussion track. Parts of the
> document may be used in other future RFCs.
>
> We have created new tickets to address the concerns discussed in IETF 101 [
> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/roll/report/2]
>
> #179 Security considerations for dao projection
> #180 13 issues to address in dao projection draft (lifetime, MOP,
> retransmissions, route cleanup)
> #186 Useofrplinfo - AD review
> #187 New version of RFC6550 - Topics to include
> #188 Should 6LBR be included into the DODAG root?
> #189 RPL and new MOP?
>
> Are #189 and #187 strongly related in anybody's view?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ines and Peter
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>