[Roll] [roll] #110: trickle-mcast: do applications receive all multicast, or just MPL encapsulated ones

"roll issue tracker" <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org> Thu, 01 November 2012 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E10721F8B20 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 07:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.488
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.488 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.111, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8rt+DENUwQft for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 07:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1B521F8A96 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 07:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([]:40911 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1TTw3D-0000XP-QP; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:47:29 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: "roll issue tracker" <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.2
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.2, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast@tools.ietf.org, mcr@sandelman.ca
X-Trac-Project: roll
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:47:19 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://svn.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/110
Message-ID: <058.c053ae172b60ad763a419d3caf1dd7ac@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 110
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast@tools.ietf.org, mcr@sandelman.ca, roll@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To: jonhui@cisco.com, richard.kelsey@silabs.com
Resent-Message-Id: <20121101144734.6F1B521F8A96@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 07:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
Resent-From: trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: [Roll] [roll] #110: trickle-mcast: do applications receive all multicast, or just MPL encapsulated ones
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Reply-To: roll@ietf.org
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:47:35 -0000

#110: trickle-mcast: do applications receive all multicast, or just MPL
encapsulated ones

 There's still the case that multicasts from non-MPL nodes are received by
 (presumably). Should there be guidelines here? Example: if an application
 on my MPL-forwarder node
 joins multicast group FF05::1234, will the application then receive IP
 multicasts sent
 with destination FF05::1234, or will it only receive those IP multicasts
 to FF05::1234
 that were delivered encapsulated in an FF0X::MPL packet ?

 That decision could be out of scope; but on the other hand may lead to
 implementers making different choices here.

 Reporter:  mcr@…            |      Owner:  draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast@…
     Type:  enhancement      |     Status:  new
 Priority:  major            |  Milestone:
Component:  trickle-mcast    |    Version:
 Severity:  In WG Last Call  |   Keywords:

Ticket URL: <https://svn.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/110>
roll <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/>