Re: [Roll] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-25: (with COMMENT)

[Mirja Kuehlewind <[e-mail]>]

Great! Thanks!


> On 17. May 2019, at 09:06, Ines Robles <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Mirja,
> 
> Thank you for your review. We have added in the new version this new text as answer to your comment.
> 
> " Since some of the uses cases here described, use IPv6-in-IPv6 encapsulation. It MUST take in consideration, when encapsulation is applied, the RFC6040 [RFC6040], which defines how the explicit congestion notification (ECN) field of the IP header should be  constructed on entry to and exit from any IPV6-in-IPV6 tunnel. Additionally, it is recommended the reading of [I-D.ietf-intarea-tunnels]."
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> the authors.
> 
> On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 2:56 PM Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-25: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I only did a quick read of this document but I would like to echo the TSV-ART
> review (Thanks Colin!) that a pointer to RFC6040 could be good in order to
> highlight support of ECN for any tunnelling solutions. Also there is
> draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels which could be a good pointer/read for this spec.
> 
>