Re: [Roll] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-roll-dis-modifications-01.txt

Hi Dominique,

Ok, however, I think any new RFC needs to mention its update to previous,
it's the user right not the IETF.

AB

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 5:31 PM <dominique.barthel@orange.com> wrote:

> Hello Abdussalam,
>
> Sorry to respond so late, your mail below became hidden under the pile-up
> after IETF106.
> You're right that draft-ietf-roll-dis-modifications-01.txt adds new
> behaviour to 6550, and so it looks that it should update 6550.
> However, we already knew we wanted to do dis-modifications at the time we
> wrote 6550, therefore we put a sentence in there "unless a flag modifies
> this behaviour".
> I would therefore think that, formally, 6550 is not updated by
> dis-modifications.
> I will need to double check with our AD's on this, though.
> Thanks for spotting this and letting us now!
> Best regards,
>
> Dominique
>
> De : Roll <roll-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Abdussalam Baryun <
> abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
> Répondre à : "roll@ietf.org" <roll@ietf.org>
> Date : Monday 25 November 2019 07:43
> À : "roll@ietf.org" <roll@ietf.org>
> Objet : Re: [Roll] FW: New Version Notification for
> draft-ietf-roll-dis-modifications-01.txt
>
> Hi
>
> I think this draft should update the RFC6550 but the draft did not mention
> updating,
>
> AB
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 11:03 AM <dominique.barthel@orange.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> In light of the current discussions on adding flags and generally
>> improving the behavior of DIS messages, I've just republished the old
>> dis-modifications draft with Informational status.
>> The purpose is to provide the WG with the use cases that were described in
>> that draft.
>> Except for the issue date and version, the draft is unchanged from -00.
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Dominique
>>
>> Le 21/11/19 16:57, « internet-drafts@ietf.org » <internet-drafts@ietf.org
>> >
>> a écrit :
>>
>> >
>> >A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-roll-dis-modifications-01.txt
>> >has been successfully submitted by Dominique Barthel and posted to the
>> >IETF repository.
>> >
>> >Name:          draft-ietf-roll-dis-modifications
>> >Revision:      01
>> >Title:         DIS Modifications
>> >Document date: 2019-11-21
>> >Group:         roll
>> >Pages:         15
>> >URL:
>> >
>> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-roll-dis-modifications-01
>> .
>> >txt
>> >Status:
>> >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-dis-modifications/
>> >Htmlized:
>> >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-roll-dis-modifications-01
>> >Htmlized:
>> >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-roll-dis-modifications
>> >Diff:
>> >https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-roll-dis-modifications-01
>> >
>> >Abstract:
>> >   This document augments RFC6550 with DIS flags and options that
>> >   allow a RPL node to better control how neighbor RPL routers respond
>> >   to its solicitation for DIOs.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>> >submission
>> >until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>> >
>> >The IETF Secretariat
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>>
>> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
>> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
>> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez
>> recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
>> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
>> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
>> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme
>> ou falsifie. Merci.
>>
>> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
>> information that may be protected by law;
>> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
>> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
>> delete this message and its attachments.
>> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have
>> been modified, changed or falsified.
>> Thank you.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Roll mailing list
>> Roll@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
>