[Roll] Feedback on p2p

Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr> Sat, 30 October 2010 10:39 UTC

Return-Path: <emmanuel.baccelli@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982873A63CB for <roll@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 03:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.284
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.284 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.308, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xu4pkGS-Aeh3 for <roll@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 03:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6333A683A for <roll@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 03:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so4054157fxm.31 for <roll@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 03:41:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:received:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=CXBAf1A70ghOVNNvvcw7zCb3vlHuKmC2X56hu7Nz/Oo=; b=NVshmJ7eRw6iGiM7sO1kR4dY7NujSofCqu72jzIoq5lLgx6izwserhocOiNi4GCXWx kljEm0qCuO0MCnYq7vCLLpJ6D0NJrEMY8ao16blD/9p39ct6bcYAN3HqURFNuG65FOBy dNwgnZRaqtuQMei55QU5bwYE1u5LSntni/TWg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type; b=HzXZ5LhjVSqqhiHBSfpS66vGC+8dcDCUbJBT8cBXRgfyO4FlMD70KG1B3/eOBwmt04 dm557as16Mgi+ngyWDCAoJ8PlQTRGKNdLdsdjU4Ot5NxrQvoGN+SSd62Eocroy7dAiDB ghcHiWqBfLwCR9GEKKK/uteWrpNxdPxRSqVSE=
Received: by 10.223.83.13 with SMTP id d13mr89302fal.56.1288435266188; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 03:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: emmanuel.baccelli@gmail.com
Received: by 10.223.103.132 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 03:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 12:40:46 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: fhktcG488yMiji0PB5DsijsUmUM
Message-ID: <AANLkTikSFF8=+U=pYBRxss1FPEBLEO-2nhT7PJz4NG9Y@mail.gmail.com>
To: ROLL WG <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf30433fa05b74b60493d336c5"
Subject: [Roll] Feedback on p2p
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 10:39:27 -0000

Dear ROLLers,

we solicit you for feedback on the p2p draft. Please review the document and
shoot any questions or comments you may have. Moreover, we are also
interested in knowing whether you have (or plan) an implementation.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl

In parallel, do take a look at the companion document providing a mechanism
that enables an RPL node to measure the quality of an existing route to/from
another RPL node. Any feedback on that too would be greatly appreciated!

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-goyal-roll-p2p-measurement


see you all soon in Beijing,


Emmanuel