IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] your comments on rpl implementation and deployment

"JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" <jvasseur@cisco.com> Tue, 04 September 2012 06:38 UTC

Return-Path: <jvasseur@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BEC21F84A0 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 23:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wf2s8Ml9DA2M for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 23:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 333B321F849C for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 23:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=jvasseur@cisco.com; l=1087; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1346740724; x=1347950324; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=4gso7qOTeF4UvlsPNnPUnDB2HLEFLXVuoDdZoLZayMY=; b=HLAhHmPnAylOD3zk73cG3qWxVodvx1c8NTPDPkOabWiScdZED533UZ3S IhKP/DbR4Bb7asixpNQ6NCbztNNtA0Z8A9kj67EM29/ZFRpviHq9KQcz6 Fg6eslH05L3jOrLKMLWDazee4hPAUF/am7NK7W3PSZ0AfEinv76X+85w0 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAD6hRVCtJV2a/2dsb2JhbABFDrsagQeCIAEBAQMBAQEBDwEnNAsFCwIBCDYQJwslAgQOBSKHZQYLmjGfeIsNhlJgA5VZgRSNH4Fngik6
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,365,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="117942606"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Sep 2012 06:38:43 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com [173.36.12.79]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q846chc3029313 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 4 Sep 2012 06:38:43 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.4.209]) by xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com ([173.36.12.79]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 01:38:43 -0500
From: "JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" <jvasseur@cisco.com>
To: Omprakash Gnawali <gnawali@cs.uh.edu>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] your comments on rpl implementation and deployment
Thread-Index: AQHNimft5hkxHCrVGU2B0jpCUox8kg==
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 06:38:42 +0000
Message-ID: <0E76A7FB-9C79-41F5-92CA-0637563478F0@cisco.com>
References: <CAErDfUQKH0n2wkRDyqof_XpWOLEHmEJ5e+kjp3m36xOfMU_+QA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAErDfUQKH0n2wkRDyqof_XpWOLEHmEJ5e+kjp3m36xOfMU_+QA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.60.114.233]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19160.004
x-tm-as-result: No--35.554700-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <AC9717FBB4B34D4CB6162F1416A3794E@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: ROLL WG <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] your comments on rpl implementation and deployment
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 06:38:44 -0000

Hi,

On Sep 3, 2012, at 4:21 PM, Omprakash Gnawali wrote:

> I am planning to update draft-gnawali-roll-rpl-recommendations in the
> next few days. I will add something about leaf nodes. It will be great
> to also hear from rest of the WG their experiences and suggestions
> from their experiences so we can document them in the draft.
> 
> JP, do you have any suggestions and insights from the deployment you
> described in the recent draft? There might be some lessons from that
> deployment others could learn and I would love to incorporate them in
> the draft.
> 

Not really, it worked as planned with tuning of course of various parameters. We will update the draft soon in light
of another large scale deployment and will let you know, thanks for asking.

Thanks.

JP.

> Here is the link to the current version of the draft:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gnawali-roll-rpl-recommendations-03
> 
> - om_p
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email