Re: [Roll] Wg adoption call for draft-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 12 February 2014 21:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3241A06D3 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:02:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.019
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_TVD_MIME_NO_HEADERS=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c0jlQcay_4Wo for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:02:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98B81A06CE for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:02:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 298632002A for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:19:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id E4228647C9; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:02:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D27E1647C8 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:02:23 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CABOxzu2TSk_XGmF09thREM8C4qM4xSOA939W42d5CnE9opg_6g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP+sJUc9hF3Bf8KP1NpQbSkR2Xd5fDAABhEG4yfT7s9vGdq9fQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABOxzu2TSk_XGmF09thREM8C4qM4xSOA939W42d5CnE9opg_6g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:02:23 -0500
Message-ID: <23277.1392238943@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Subject: Re: [Roll] Wg adoption call for draft-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 21:02:26 -0000

Kerry Lynn <kerlyn@ieee.org> wrote:
    > However, I will continue to observe that while MPL is a proposal that may
    > solve the multicast problem for wireless mesh networks, its applicability is
    > not limited to these networks.

1) Do you have reason to believe that DHCPv6 may be the wrong tool for
   configuration in other uses?

2) do we need to have a second applicability statement.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/