Re: [Roll] routing-dispatch (6lorh) change in ownership from 6LO to ROLL

[Gabriel Montenegro <[e-mail]>]

Michael Richardson volunteered (cc-ed).

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ines Robles [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 19:26
> To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[e-mail]>om>;
> [e-mail]; Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks
> <[e-mail]>
> Cc: Alvaro Retana (aretana) <[e-mail]>om>; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [Roll] routing-dispatch (6lorh) change in ownership from 6LO to
> ROLL
> 
> Hi Pascal,
> 
> Thanks for your comment. it makes sense.
> 
> Does this document has a shepherd assigned? Someone volunteer :-)? It will be
> nice to have new people of WGs involved in this task.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Peter and Ines.
> 
> 
> On 03/22/2016 03:57 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:
> > Hello Ines,
> >
> > I think the draft is ripe for last call.
> >
> > We have spent all the cycles in the 6lo WG and the work is done, upon
> validation of the ROLL team. Last call is an excellent way of validating that.
> >
> > Could you please consider launching it? 6lo just did for the paging dispatch,
> and doing it now means that we can announce the result in Buenos Aires.
> >
> > Take care,
> >
> > Pascal
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Ines Robles [mailto:[e-mail]]
> >> Sent: lundi 21 mars 2016 22:09
> >> To: [e-mail]; Routing Over Low power and Lossy
> >> networks <[e-mail]>
> >> Cc: Alvaro Retana (aretana) <[e-mail]>om>;
> >> [e-mail];
> >> [e-mail]; Michael Richardson
> >> <[e-mail]>ca>; [e-mail]; Suresh Krishnan
> >> <[e-mail]>om>; draft-ietf-6lo-paging-
> >> [e-mail]; Gabriel Montenegro
> >> <[e-mail]>om>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> >> Subject: Re: [Roll] routing-dispatch (6lorh) change in ownership from
> >> 6LO to ROLL
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 03/21/2016 09:44 AM, peter van der Stok wrote:
> >>> Happy to collaborate, but still dependent on Ines point of view.
> >> It is ok for me, Pascal just submitted the new version. :)
> >>> I would suggest that I-D is submitted as ietf-roll-.
> >>> That does not need to take time; only the existing draft with a new
> >>> draft identifier.
> >>>
> >>> I prefer to start WGLC during the meeting in B-A, having explained
> >>> the situation.
> >> Yes, we can start the WGLC on monday 4th.
> >>> Anything I am overlooking?
> >>>
> >>> Peter
> >>>
> >>> Brian Haberman schreef op 2016-03-19 00:13:
> >>>> Works for me as well.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Brian
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Mar 18, 2016, at 6:27 PM, Alvaro Retana (aretana)
> >>>>> <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That works for me.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Alvaro.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thumb-typed and autocorrected..
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mar 18, 2016, at 3:46 PM, Michael Richardson
> >>>>> <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yes, Ideally I'd like to see it as 6lo saying, well, we're done
> >>>>>>> and happy but prior to IESG please review it from the ROLL / RPL
> >>>>>>> perspective to ensure completeness WRT to the aspect relevant to
> >>>>>>> RPL. Maybe all we need os the chairs telling us that they feel
> >>>>>>> the consensus exists at 6lo, and that they are happy to delegate
> >>>>>>> the last call to ROLL?
> >>>>>> I think that would suffice, if ADs approve.
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Roll mailing list
> >>>> [e-mail]
> >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fww
> >>>>
> w.ietf.org%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2froll&data=01%7c01%7cGabriel.Monte
> >>>>
> negro%40microsoft.com%7c0e636663df984b261bce08d352c29efc%7c72f988
> bf
> >>>>
> 86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=FzPpD0yJbEDSStuSXJqUAO6l3Rv3x8
> U0
> >>>> %2borDMFs1pgg%3d

--- Begin Message ---

Gabriel Montenegro <[e-mail]> wrote:
    > Also, James will be the shepherd for paging-dispatch, but for
    > routing-dispatch, you'll need to assign someone.

Unless someone thinks I can too heavily involved, I think that I can step
forward to shephard routing-dispatch.

--
Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

--- End Message ---