Re: [Roll] Gen-ART LC review for draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration-04

Yusuke DOI <yusuke.doi@toshiba.co.jp> Thu, 02 July 2015 09:26 UTC

Return-Path: <yusuke.doi@toshiba.co.jp>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8E01B310F; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 02:26:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.764
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.764 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FF_IHOPE_YOU_SINK=2.166, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l3MAfYH2kuAQ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 02:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imx2.toshiba.co.jp (imx2.toshiba.co.jp [106.186.93.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D98C1B3107; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 02:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tsbmgw-mgw02.tsbmgw-mgw02.toshiba.co.jp ([133.199.200.50]) by imx2.toshiba.co.jp with ESMTP id t629Qcbh021469 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Jul 2015 18:26:38 +0900 (JST)
Received: from tsbmgw-mgw02 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tsbmgw-mgw02.tsbmgw-mgw02.toshiba.co.jp (8.13.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t629QdjW024600; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 18:26:39 +0900
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by tsbmgw-mgw02 (JAMES SMTP Server 2.3.1) with SMTP ID 101; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 18:26:39 +0900 (JST)
Received: from arc1.toshiba.co.jp ([133.199.194.235]) by tsbmgw-mgw02.tsbmgw-mgw02.toshiba.co.jp (8.13.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t629QdIx024576; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 18:26:39 +0900
Received: (from root@localhost) by arc1.toshiba.co.jp id t629QbDA003866; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 18:26:37 +0900 (JST)
Received: from unknown [133.199.192.144] by arc1.toshiba.co.jp with ESMTP id UAA03860; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 18:26:37 +0900
Received: from mx2.toshiba.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ovp2.toshiba.co.jp with ESMTP id t629QbkQ013615; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 18:26:37 +0900 (JST)
Received: from spiffy20.isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp by toshiba.co.jp id t629QaUl021510; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 18:26:36 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:200:1b1:1010:e95c:15be:95b0:42d8] (unknown [IPv6:2001:200:1b1:1010:e95c:15be:95b0:42d8]) by spiffy20.isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBF5B18F4D9; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 18:26:36 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <559503CC.7030409@toshiba.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 18:26:36 +0900
From: Yusuke DOI <yusuke.doi@toshiba.co.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: roll@ietf.org, draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration.all@tools.ietf.org
References: <01ea01d0af9c$de6319e0$9b294da0$@akayla.com>
In-Reply-To: <01ea01d0af9c$de6319e0$9b294da0$@akayla.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/tmPA9sqMqbbZC37xrgABVnH82_A>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] Gen-ART LC review for draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration-04
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 09:26:41 -0000

Dear Peter,

Thank you for review. I submitted -06 (-05 contains some nits) as a revised version.

On 2015-06-26 08:15, Peter Yee wrote:
> Some of the parameters are described with their bit lengths, others are not.
> Lengths are listed haphazardly.  Be consistent in either including them or
> not.  Timer lengths are listed as n-bit integers, but this may be confusing
> given that the document says "Short floating point format is used to
> describe the wide range of timer values".  So, are the timer values floating
> point or integer?  Is the combined implication supposed to be that the
> numbers are formatted as floating point (for greater range), but only take
> on integer values?  Given that the values in this document are all given in
> reference to division by the value of TUNIT, it's possible that values might
> not be integers.  If that happens and only integers are desired, is rounding
> or truncation preferred?  Also note that Appendix A indicates that "short
> unsigned floating point" was dropped.  It's not completely clear if that
> means that "short [signed?] floating point" was adopted in its stead or
> whether actual short integers were preferred.

Short floating point is dropped but some texts have not removed (my mistake). Thank you for pointing out. All values should be in integer.

Thank you again for your efforts on review (and sorry for lot of nits...)

Yusuke