Re: [Roll] interest in asymmetrical links support?
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 12 March 2014 20:54 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116881A0785 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.019
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_TVD_MIME_NO_HEADERS=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CmDeLb64t8bv for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:54:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F147A1A0664 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:54:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9272002F; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 18:13:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id B5CE5647C9; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:54:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01F3647C8; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:54:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD8417F0EC0@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
References: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD8417F0EC0@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:54:38 -0400
Message-ID: <5215.1394657678@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/ulZYuf0PuC8_9ELrBqury61XrfQ
Cc: roll <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] interest in asymmetrical links support?
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:54:46 -0000
Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote: > This is another pending work related to RPL, specifically on asym. links operations. > The work was triggered by a discussion with Don Sturek, but failed to > attract WG attention at the time. > I can revive it if interests grows? > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-roll-asymlink-02 My impression is that we got stuck on asymmetric link issues because many were unclear how they were going to get ETX, period, let alone assymetric ETX. I think that MLE makes some of this clearer. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works IETF ROLL WG co-chair. http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/
- [Roll] interest in asymmetrical links support? Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] interest in asymmetrical links support? Don Sturek
- Re: [Roll] interest in asymmetrical links support? Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] interest in asymmetrical links support? Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] interest in asymmetrical links support? Don Sturek