Re: [Roll] Sibling information

Rahul Arvind Jadhav <rahul.jadhav@huawei.com> Thu, 25 July 2019 00:33 UTC

Return-Path: <rahul.jadhav@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1AB31203E9 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 17:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CxzvxREX3R18 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 17:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C28BE1200B8 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 17:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id A3F8947604FE8A667277 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 01:33:41 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.57) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 01:33:41 +0100
Received: from lhreml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.57) by lhreml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.57) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 01:33:41 +0100
Received: from BLREML407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.20.4.45) by lhreml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.57) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 01:33:40 +0100
Received: from BLREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.9.111]) by BLREML407-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.20.4.45]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 06:03:31 +0530
From: Rahul Arvind Jadhav <rahul.jadhav@huawei.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Sibling information
Thread-Index: AdVCbFxjQmGr9n08QiSNVldJ8OXwSAAEwVbw
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 00:33:31 +0000
Message-ID: <982B626E107E334DBE601D979F31785C5DF5BC96@BLREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <MN2PR11MB35651875289F99DDB70BEB93D8C60@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB35651875289F99DDB70BEB93D8C60@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-IN, zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.61.109.81]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_982B626E107E334DBE601D979F31785C5DF5BC96BLREML503MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/uz3ZEcBQ4hAG7gK-EuBC1VdwWos>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Sibling information
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 00:33:46 -0000

Hi Pascal,

Isn't it already possible to send multiple Transit Information Option in DAO in non-storing MOP for a node to inform root of node's multiple parents?
I understand you mentioned sibling information but I am wondering how root makes use of sibling information to optimize P-DAO. I can clearly relate how root can use multiple parent's info to optimize P-DAO but not sure how sibling info will help.

Regards,
Rahul


From: Roll [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Sent: 25 July 2019 06:12
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: [Roll] Sibling information

Dear all

Following up on the WG meeting today:

It makes sense to make the draft complete by adding a sibling information in the Non storing mode DAO to the root. This was the root can compute more optimized P DAO.

Are we OK that I include some text and a proposed format about that in the next revision?

All the best

Pascal