IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] [6tisch] Suggestion to add Example Packets for 6TiSCH Configuration into useofrplinfo draft

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 21 July 2017 08:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A819131AA9; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 01:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n1FAXao6SRcC; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 01:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:de77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF05C12EB2B; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 01:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:1998:a11:96ff:fe01:81e0]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0D1B1F8F6; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 08:07:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 893011626; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:07:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <CADJ9OA-rGz5SPsm6chEFHvRnP6nSY-8BBGxUfav56abRugFqnA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP+sJUetFuxV+QHGev_GniU2f0R8F75R26uah=zdooPQ7i_emQ@mail.gmail.com> <65ebd4a8922641c33865871d76e94c10@xs4all.nl> <a7e2651f87234459995890d6a76a0d1d@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <a23cea44c0adf8a67b25138b77efd63d@xs4all.nl> <CADJ9OA-rGz5SPsm6chEFHvRnP6nSY-8BBGxUfav56abRugFqnA@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Thomas Watteyne <thomas.watteyne@inria.fr> message dated "Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:46:46 +0200."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:07:43 +0200
Message-ID: <27605.1500624463@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/vDCaTsA8VDWa74N6kCyCV5u2uzE>
Subject: Re: [Roll] [6tisch] Suggestion to add Example Packets for 6TiSCH Configuration into useofrplinfo draft
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 08:07:58 -0000

Thomas Watteyne <thomas.watteyne@inria.fr> wrote:
    > Thinking about it, I believe it's better to keep
    > draft-munoz-6tisch-examples as a standalone document. I will be easier
    > to maintain, compared to splitting the contents across multiple drafts,
    > or worse, replicating the contents in multiple drafts.

I don't mind leaving it seperate.  I suggest that a well curated wiki
would work best here, at least in the short term.  Given that the IESG is
pulling back on the number of non-standards track documents they want to
process, I think that would better.

But perhaps we will still want to grab a few example packets both
uncompressed and compressed for useofrplinfo.

(There is a reason to implement uncompressed RPI, which is because you extend
the RPL DODAG across non-constrained media)

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email