[Roll] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-17: (with COMMENT)

[Martin Duke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-17: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS.

I found last paragraph of Section 3 confusing. I suggest the following change:

OLD:
Section 6.3.1 of [RFC6550] defines a 3-bit Mode of Operation (MOP) in the DIO
Base Object. This specification applies to MOP values 0 to 6. For a MOP value
of 7, the compression MUST be used by default regardless of the setting of the
"T" flag.

NEW:
"Section 6.3.1 of [RFC6550] defines a 3-bit Mode of Operation (MOP) in the DIO
Base Object. This specification adds codepoint 7 to the registry for this
field.   For a MOP value of 7, the compression MUST be used by default
regardless of the setting of the "T" flag.“