Re: [Roll] WG call for adoption for draft-jadhav-roll-mopex-02

Hi,

As participant, I support the adoption of this document and the split done.

Thank you,

Ines.

On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:42 AM Georgios Z. Papadopoulos <
georgios.papadopoulos@imt-atlantique.fr> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I have read this draft before the split and indeed, I find them much more
> clear as separated.
>
> +1 for adoption,
> Giorgos
>
>
> On Mar 12, 2020, at 02:36, Rahul Jadhav <nyrahul@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> Kindly note that this draft resulted because of the split up between
> capabilities and MOPex.
> Earlier the WG had adopted the combined idea of caps and MOPex. However,
> we decided to split up because of no dependency between the two and because
> MOPex can be handled much faster than capabilities (due to low complexity).
>
> This draft does not have any design/rationale change, wrt MOPex handling,
> after the split.
>
> Thanks,
> Rahul
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Roll <roll-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Ines Robles <
> mariainesrobles=40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> *Sent:* 11 March 2020 09:51 PM
> *To:* roll <roll@ietf.org>
> *Cc:* Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
> *Subject:* [Roll] WG call for adoption for draft-jadhav-roll-mopex-02
>
> Dear all,
>
> This is a WG call for adoption of draft-jadhav-roll-mopex-02.
>
> Please send your comments by 25th March 2020.
>
> We kindly reminder also that we have an ongoing WGLC
> for draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-04, please states your comments on it.
>
> Thank you very much,
>
> Ines, Dominique and Michael.
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>