[Roll] WRT adopting draft-rahul-roll-rpl-observations as WG document

[Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>]

{been watching the youtube video of the ROLL session}

1) I think that the work in roll-rpl-observations is really important.
   -> that's why we should adopt the document so that it can have priority
      over other non-WG documents in the agenda.
   As our AD pointed out, we don't have to publish it.

2) Starting rfc6550bis or rfc6550updates is very important!!!
   We have some options on how to do this, one of which is to publish a bunch
   of very small updates.  That's probably the lowest latency way, but it
   does cause more IESG and RFC-EDITOR work.
   So I think that we will be forced to publish a ~60-page update document
   that collects all sorts of things.

3) I'd like to move to obsolete (mark as "historical") storing mode in favour
   of dao-projection mode.  I think that this is mostly orthogonal to the updates work, but
   if we agree that we are going in that direction, there might be updates
   that we don't need to do.

4) We need a new node capabilities mechanism.  It could be quite
   controversial as there are a lot of design choices here.  maybe we should 
   probably encourage implementations, and then experimental RFCs.

-- 
Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-