[Roll] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-applicability-ami-13: (with COMMENT)
"Suresh Krishnan" <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> Tue, 03 May 2016 18:42 UTC
Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietf.org
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0201012D157; Tue, 3 May 2016 11:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.19.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160503184237.8197.30865.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 11:42:38 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/yDRyJwy8yQYsZdtwSwSthvrQs0s>
Cc: roll-chairs@ietf.org, roll@ietf.org, draft-ietf-roll-applicability-ami@ietf.org, mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca
Subject: [Roll] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-applicability-ami-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 18:42:38 -0000
Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-roll-applicability-ami-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-applicability-ami/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 1.2: Required reading - Why is the item [surveySG] in required reading not part of the normative references? Section 1.3: Please expand RPL before first use and add a reference to RFC6550 Section 2: Is this section really required? Seems like a summarization of the RPL RFC. At least consider removing the part that starts with "RPL was designed to meet the following application requirements:" and mentions a list of requirement RFCs. This list does not seem relevant here and is also covered in the RPL spec itself. Section 4.1: This does not sound right. Isn't the periodic meter read traffic going the other direction? " The traffic generated by the head-end server and destined to metering devices is dominated by periodic meter reads," Section 7.4.1: Please add a reference the trickle algorithm at first use. e.g. "Trickle [RFC6206] was designed to be..."
- [Roll] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ie… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [Roll] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draf… Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)
- Re: [Roll] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draf… Suresh Krishnan