Re: [Roll] ID Tracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building-07.txt>

Yvonne-Anne Pignolet <yvonneanne.pignolet@gmail.com> Thu, 05 March 2015 12:49 UTC

Return-Path: <yvonneanne.pignolet@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB471B2C6C; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 04:49:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sz-PiJwXyDHP; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 04:49:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22b.google.com (mail-lb0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 678E31B2C4D; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 04:49:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lbiv13 with SMTP id v13so32386909lbi.1; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 04:49:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=A0CgrmUtcpKL69nRHbfV2UXnbJqs+DIIX2aLpKdW3hg=; b=GWn1yWuXSBpvvShKydU3YyTTIbO8wj7F+IQCIRg3I+w3OMSbL6bAFoxX19uQCbbJS+ qxKg7mcuXsSj2EyIQVuX3CP5yjp7c/T845Afek1Z2CE1VPoa7qYt1uuQNumEbnPn6x1x 6Ngf7McgUAfJ87yNN0f5aAI0ZGUdkdc1QTW3CqLxG9Avgcj1+q9o9U3DpCwNxgSa8ejJ IQ10lw/0r0BnLFszjViHHvP+2y/qYgjiaMyur4VY/Z3VN8EWvX3g7zMJm0IdQWKXR2VE bQGYWoYVBCSZwV3jRcj0kNBYrhwzK6knStjJ3zjQKVrsVfMA8oi2cqfzlR2V9r56K897 TXfg==
X-Received: by 10.112.42.164 with SMTP id p4mr1477155lbl.119.1425559761842; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 04:49:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.13.10 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 04:49:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20150304214101.9011.50757.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20150304214101.9011.50757.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Yvonne-Anne Pignolet <yvonneanne.pignolet@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 13:49:01 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMM8JVuFJ=ZsZJbNbL9zghqUh8G5oVOtJ7epKotrCmGuca2Q3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1134d13c35f677051089ff55"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/yK9swvrLfsqmd1L3EEiu5L-0hQs>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 04:50:30 -0800
Cc: roll-chairs@ietf.org, roll@ietf.org, draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building.ad@ietf.org, draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building@ietf.org, draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building.shepherd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] ID Tracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building-07.txt>
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 12:49:32 -0000

Dear all

I updated the shepherd write-up accordingly.

Best Regards
Yvonne-Anne

On 4 March 2015 at 22:41, IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
wrote:

> IESG state changed to AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed from AD Evaluation
> AD review
> =====
>
> Thanks for this really nice document. I found it an easy read.
>
> I have done my usual AD review to catch issues before IETF last call and
> IESG evaluation.
>
> I only have a handful of small issues, but I think it would be worth
> resolving them with a new revision before we go to last call. I have
> marked the datatracker to show "Revised I-D needed" and I'll wait to
> see you post a new version.
>
> Thanks for the work,
> Adrian
>
> ===
>
> The chairs and I have discussed moving this document onto the Standards
> Track in accordance with the description of an Applicability Statement in
> Section 32 of RFC 2026. The only thing you need to do is update the
> "Intended status" to say "Proposed Standard".
>
> The Shepherd will also need to update the write-up and flip the field in
> the datatracker.
>
> ---
>
> In 1.1. you have
>
>    The ROLL working group has specified a set of routing protocols for
>    Lossy and Low- resource Networks (LLN) [RFC6550]
>
> Yet 6550 defines
>
>    Low-Power and Lossy Networks (LLNs)
>
> ---
>
> Section 1.2 seems to only be necessary for a use of "MUST" in section
> 7. I am comfortable with you having used normal case ("must", "should",
> "recommended") in the text. Could Section 7 also drop this to "must"
> and then you could remove Section 1.2?
>
> ---
>
> 2.2.7 mentions AODV without expanding the abbreviation and without a
> reference.
>
> ---
>
> A few abbreviations need to be expanded on first use:
> DIO
> DAG
> MPL
> DAO
> RA
> ULA
> DODAG
> ETX
>
> ---
>
> 4.1.7 has...
>
>    Repetition of the message can be inhibited by a small
>    value of k.
>
> I think this is lacking a little context. What is k?
>
> ---
>
> Please mark Section 11 "To be deleted by the RFC Editor before
> publication."
> ID Tracker URL:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building/
>
>