Re: [Roll] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-03.txt

I think I got the point here. But I have one question,

Assume a 6LR who does not support 8138 and does not support this draft. If this happens then that link (in which the 6LR is part) won't work for compressed source-routed traffic.
Ideally, the root will set the T flag only when it knows that all the nodes support 8138. But still, it would be better to tell the reader of this scenario and let know of the dire consequences.

[Pascal] On the side, I'll be changing the security section to use set and reset for the "T" flag as opposed to turn on per your comment earlier.Of that works for you it will be in the next publication, you may already look at it in the ROLL github repo.

[RJ] Works for me. Thanks,

Best,
Rahul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rahul Jadhav <nyrahul@outlook.com>
> Sent: mercredi 22 janvier 2020 16:52
> To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>; Routing Over Low
> power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [Roll] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-03.txt
>
> Thank you Pascal, Li for the changes.
>
> One comment based on the changes:
> Section 5:
> "A parent propagates the "T" flag as set whether it supports RFC 8138 or not."
> [RJ] I think this is confusing. Consider that the parent does not support RFC
> 8138... according to this text a parent may propagate "T" flag = 1, but this is
> not possible.
>
> Nit:
> "...connectivity regardless on the way the RPL..."
> on the way -> of the way
>
> Best,
> Rahul
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Roll <roll-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
> <pthubert@cisco.com>
>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 11:17 AM
>
> To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
>
> Subject: [Roll] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-03.txt
>
>
>
>
> Dear all
>
>
>
> This publication addresses the first round of review by Rahul (many thanks
> Rahul!).
>
> If Rahul is OK with the proposals then I believe we can move to WGLC.
>
>
>
> All the best
>
>
>
> Pascal
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Roll <roll-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
>
> Sent: mercredi 22 janvier 2020 12:14
>
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
>
> Cc: roll@ietf.org
>
> Subject: [Roll] I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-03.txt
>
>
>
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>
> This draft is a work item of the Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks
> WG of the IETF.
>
>
>
>         Title           : Configuration option for RFC 8138
>
>         Authors         : Pascal Thubert
>
>                           Li Zhao
>
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-03.txt
>
>         Pages           : 8
>
>         Date            : 2020-01-22
>
>
>
> Abstract:
>
>    This document complements RFC 8138 and dedicates a bit in the RPL
>
>    configuration option defined in RFC 6550 to indicate whether RFC 8138
>
>    compression is used within the RPL Instance.
>
>
>
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138/
>
>
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-03
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-03
>
>
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-03
>
>
>
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
>
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Roll mailing list
>
> Roll@ietf.org
>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Roll mailing list
>
> Roll@ietf.org
>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll