Archive

+1!

2014-10-21 21:38 GMT-03:00 Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>du>:

> +1 on the proposal.
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Xavier Vilajosana <
> xvilajosana@eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> I fully support that approach. Hope to contribute and make it happen as
>> soon as possible.
>>
>> regards,
>> Xavi
>>
>> 2014-10-15 8:32 GMT+02:00 Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>om>:
>>
>> Dear all:
>>>
>>> During the 6TiSCH bi-weekly virtual interim on Friday, we agreed that
>>> the minimal I-D (draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal) must indicate the compression
>>> method for the RPL Information (see RFC 6553), so as to ensure
>>> interoperation between 6TiSCH devices.
>>>
>>> We discussed our options, basically either a 6lo approach or a Flow
>>> Label approach. The rough consensus at the call was to try and focus on a
>>> 6lo approach and evaluate where that leads us.
>>>
>>> Because this means that the minimal draft will have a normative
>>> reference on a WIP I-D, we recognized that this approach may delay the
>>> publication of the final RFC. Per IETF procedures, the minimal draft will
>>> be stalled in the RFC editor queue in MISREF state until the 6lo work
>>> completes. So the consensus was also to support the 6lo work so as to
>>> expedite it as much as possible.
>>>
>>> The idea would be to republish a standard track draft-ietf-6lo- ASAP,
>>> based on the existing proposals (which are rapidly converging); then, Xavi
>>> would include a normative reference to that work in the minimal I-D before
>>> its publication to IESG, which is scheduled in November (yes, this is
>>> aggressive).
>>>
>>> This is a call to confirm the rough consensus on the ML, open till the
>>> next interim call on October 24th. Please provide us with any relevant
>>> comment (and participate to the 6lo discussions in the meantime!).
>>>
>>> If the result is positive:
>>> - we plan to call for a 6lo WG doc adoption in Hawaii
>>> - we are looking for an aggressive schedule to limit the impact on the
>>> publication of the minimal RFC
>>>
>>> 6TiSCH may host the 6lo discussion so as to:
>>> - benefit from the early morning schedule
>>> - attract more 6TiSCH people to the discussion
>>>
>>> More the published minutes:
>>> - Webex recording:
>>> https://cisco.webex.com/ciscosales/lsr.php?RCID=36a3b7df06694258a3ac65bfc519212f
>>> - Wiki: https://bitbucket.org/6tisch/meetings/wiki/141010_webex
>>> - Slides:
>>> https://bitbucket.org/6tisch/meetings/src/master/141010_webex/slides_141010_webex.ppt
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Pascal
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Roll mailing list
>>> Roll@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Roll mailing list
>> Roll@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>


-- 
DIEGO DUJOVNE
Académico Escuela de Ingeniería en Informática y Telecomunicaciones
Facultad de Ingeniería UDP
www.ingenieria.udp.cl
(56 2) 676 8125

Re: [Roll] Call to confirm a rough consensus on RPL info