IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: routing area design team on dataplane encapsulation considerations

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Tue, 09 December 2014 22:53 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731831A8785 for <routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 14:53:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4pxBc1ap-vqO for <routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 14:53:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 655AF1A87B8 for <routing-discussion@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 14:53:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=419; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1418165595; x=1419375195; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FEzHuLVVu89gQn57OOWGeCxF5PRYsC17AQAibkMunZw=; b=func27PUMDCSXnxR5jkTCNHrpIywAnaGn/pEkkopMwYxRkdul+1jOdVC duRdSBhp6552m3zBdZ0MZjo5nZ47frwTrY2xjLWHJScnQaJH4qeLs1kT6 RNpr+ui2Brl3ub3+rVca8e1RgSMopK2lm5rOo29dQqABsL70tb/l2RLwf s=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,548,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="263394192"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Dec 2014 22:53:13 +0000
Received: from [10.61.97.162] (dhcp-10-61-97-162.cisco.com [10.61.97.162]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sB9MrDrH029830; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 22:53:13 GMT
Message-ID: <54877D58.9050002@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 22:53:12 +0000
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, "routing-discussion@ietf.org" <routing-discussion@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: routing area design team on dataplane encapsulation considerations
References: <CAG4d1rd60hK8=WtYw-nid_Z7Z8+TvdzA52fNx3pFjND+eDWAfA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1rd60hK8=WtYw-nid_Z7Z8+TvdzA52fNx3pFjND+eDWAfA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/routing-discussion/SnkXf0pHR7injJMzowaYlySJHK8
X-BeenThere: routing-discussion@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: Routing Area General mailing list <routing-discussion.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/routing-discussion/>
List-Post: <mailto:routing-discussion@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 22:53:20 -0000

Alia

On 09/12/2014 22:46, Alia Atlas wrote:
> * IPv6 header protection (non-zero UDP checksum over IPv6 issue)
I am not sure if it is the non-zero UDP checksum over IPv6 issue, or
the zeroUDP checksum over IPv6 issue.

Most people doing tunneling seem quite happy with zero but get pushback
from the transport area.

Perhaps the topic is really

* IPv6 header protection (UDP checksum issue)

- Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email