1st ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Future of Internet Routing & Addressing (FIRA)

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 24 March 2022 14:04 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9963A0ADE for <routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 07:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MXzEcyAEXFIA for <routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 07:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D6F83A07F6 for <routing-discussion@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 07:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 22OE4L0H001135 for <routing-discussion@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 14:04:21 GMT
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 418864608D for <routing-discussion@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 14:04:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3E2460AF for <routing-discussion@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 14:04:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <routing-discussion@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 14:04:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([148.252.133.86]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 22OE4Htq016058 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <routing-discussion@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 14:04:19 GMT
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: routing-discussion@ietf.org
Subject: 1st ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Future of Internet Routing & Addressing (FIRA)
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 14:04:17 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <020501d83f88$0e6a4fa0$2b3eeee0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: Adg/h7XQchD3lztvTBqNtqjtKO+tfA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 148.252.133.86
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-8.6.0.1018-26792.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--0.040-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--0.040-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-8.6.1018-26792.000
X-TMASE-Result: 10--0.040400-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: L3N24WoCaUvwCP7/v7egpesLOhZcNxRimdrHMkUHHq+yujf0MQZGbRjb R/XCsHXW+iiqxzAROGudg3WMky4XjlQeeXZETLPM8eSmTJSmEv0K8F8LdjFVxqpJJeOmt6X/FvJ u8YoHTSA4HFt+vqKGDMDW16CRyJCwi1S0n1RgFftM7OLvNT++6Ta6AaQm7fhmx8BJ7uScK20b8J PsJKmcvaDaLneG9U+FuQ/XCKpHG8FBsEK9eEk6YMjsgOt7O3dLHo5fF1EYvHzRdVkadqUlW+6RR 4lImIViSqCpHZaAZ3JRNnK2BdpDFykm5PRe6fZWoezu6s3sLuBBHuVYxc8DWwJkwOA7afHMzKAC X7I5tE4K4x40jyi/lwb1Mkc4NQ67kfRhdidsajM5f9Xw/xqKXcidYBYDjITpi2QFaYS1v20qtq5 d3cxkNXzZzIGxRZjnu4oeG2xKNf9g1bHz5CjtsREA+5ZOhcevbqWY1fZVP0E=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/routing-discussion/kEYgI76I6Twzvrzstkuveu0Gwdk>
X-BeenThere: routing-discussion@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area General Discussion list <routing-discussion.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/routing-discussion/>
List-Post: <mailto:routing-discussion@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 14:04:30 -0000

Hi All,

I think this will be of direct interest to many on this list and provide a
way of advancing discussions of Internet routing and addressing.

We have organised a SIGCOMM 2022 workshop covering several topics discussed
here recently. The workshop CFP may be found here:   

1st ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Future of Internet Routing & Addressing (FIRA)
https://conferences.sigcomm.org/sigcomm/2022/workshop-fira.html 

>>
The Future of Internet Routing and Addressing (FIRA) workshop aims at
bringing these communities together with the intention of synthesizing a
unified architectural view on how routing and addressing ought to evolve. In
other words, FIRA is looking to investigate and expand the boundaries of
what can be achieved by introducing new architectures rather than point
solutions, those architectures extending existing or inventing new routing
and addressing techniques that modify the default forwarding behavior to be
based on other information present in the packet, said behavior being either
configured policy or dynamically programmed into the routers and devices.
These new forwarding behaviors aim at causing new and alternative path
processing by routers, such as:

Determinism of quality of delivery in terms of throughput, latency, jitter,
drop precedence.
Support for resilience in terms of survival of network failures and delivery
degradation.
Support for highly distributed, virtualized service execution environments,
where route changes are aligned (in time) with the ability to establish new
service execution points

Improvement of routing performance in terms of the volume of data that has
to be exchanged both to establish and to maintain the routing tables.

Deployability in terms of configuration, training, development of new
hardware/software, and interaction with pre-existing network technologies
and uses.

Efficiency of manageability in terms of, i. diagnostic management, ii.
management of Service KPIs with/without guarantees, and iii. dynamic and
controlled instantiation of management information in the packets.

The FIRA workshop also solicits work on use cases, design principles,
architectures, techniques, implementations, and experience insights that
address the highlighted objectives.
<<

We encourage submissions from everyone working in routing and addressing. 

Please submit your paper via https://fira2022.hotcrp.com. 

Best,
Adrian