Fwd: Last Call: <draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-13.txt> (Effect of Pervasive Encryption on Operators) to Informational RFC

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Sun, 12 November 2017 13:24 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B69A129431 for <routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 05:24:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d_aHOS4mI9hs for <routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 05:24:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x232.google.com (mail-ot0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64C4E127BA3 for <routing-discussion@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 05:24:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x232.google.com with SMTP id 18so11633341oty.9 for <routing-discussion@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 05:24:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=K2YacGgMWeKIMqEG5zK4mdKbQo43xM8ZyHYXdeDDrjs=; b=FhgX5v61SDARmTiZFdXpn2Z9qOBoKASJf16mcyTCIxo95hdUZxSAv6NX8RPAcVeGPF w+RCEo+eaX0p0Bmlw0F7k3QJJzLE0VZi6z9xPDDeAmeYJIbPS8VL4yPwY/mW69OT9Wg2 VvGn1mRSvGqh7+42Bk7VQJeLIJBQe/p0tCujsORPWyYXu8JIPbPTu7D7hDcPaWjw8jEQ c46JznALeUC/ckbJgj4Z4NaueygvWTte+wdMIeOkFP3jNqwSRPUsFwKYeYLT1AmpIbAw 3+mafLkpPTvwfI8mcP2R5PZJYiUP0xKouknLe4qn1cse7OLgi1n7WpbEZL8cfbpjGU+S R8ZQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=K2YacGgMWeKIMqEG5zK4mdKbQo43xM8ZyHYXdeDDrjs=; b=Jb+cN3TrC7ZZUcwpF/5Ed3HmWnKYMOJbstZkeb1DRTEy+WJQmMkqy7l6ccY4POK4oa RoPMB6P+6GosPaTPwmMR5iKJLjrtHbHakQOOSnEe0A5tO3rxy0toN/UAW5g9DEf0ulbe PziRHv1xIJZtgeAxInuHAfDRPXsTDQYWqYBYM4ITnM35YIZl9jjTZ3vtztsXmNF0wcNZ vZF1Yby7nHHfB8bAefFBQ424pqSwlJxbFfyJTstUIHPYsYVWVqoO1K001WeygCc/CsKV ZELNtkQjFcJ/jLrwES338wHL8yeJfshHjVeOCdckpGdQWk7CR3ITURCsBd4BMI9P/YnX Iz+A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5xbtkbqaDVCwcE/W59hkXR9BUQEVW5O0G/QubytNPSOxIZo8pc 6utlFm4Y+G0kyu3CsBEm1YV7hqNxjdznTlWE+nlzqg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYvBCdNjVOET2RuZCTBwez4gc6/tjSTR6ENa826Zxy0+ueyJLe3PcTflAecbFYc0ODiiXGgYgoqkSUDa8nbFrk=
X-Received: by 10.157.43.212 with SMTP id u78mr693033ota.185.1510493040305; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 05:24:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.0.143 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 05:23:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <150997721010.25597.12135786015002954174.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <150997721010.25597.12135786015002954174.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 08:23:59 -0500
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rfrsG_Nj-My9df3KTcdqrka7DwM8wckgB0Pr45GUjF6HA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: Last Call: <draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-13.txt> (Effect of Pervasive Encryption on Operators) to Informational RFC
To: "routing-discussion@ietf.org" <routing-discussion@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113b0a881a6bff055dc91143"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/routing-discussion/qhAFvo9ZyPmjmBjaoo0oIMrCRW8>
X-BeenThere: routing-discussion@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area General mailing list <routing-discussion.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/routing-discussion/>
List-Post: <mailto:routing-discussion@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 13:24:03 -0000

I would like to call folks attention to this draft, that is in IETF Last
Call again.
Additional reviews and feedback would be appreciated.

Regards,
Alia


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:06 AM
Subject: Last Call: <draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-13.txt> (Effect of
Pervasive Encryption on Operators) to Informational RFC
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: paul.hoffman@vpnc.org, draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt@ietf.org



The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the
following document: - 'Effect of Pervasive Encryption on Operators'
  <draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-13.txt> as Informational RFC

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2017-12-04. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
of
the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


   Pervasive Monitoring (PM) attacks on the privacy of Internet users is
   of serious concern to both the user and the operator communities.
   RFC7258 discussed the critical need to protect users' privacy when
   developing IETF specifications and also recognized making networks
   unmanageable to mitigate PM is not an acceptable outcome, an
   appropriate balance is needed.  This document discusses current
   security and network management practices that may be impacted by the
   shift to increased use of encryption to help guide protocol
   development in support of manageable, secure networks.




The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.