Return-Path: X-Original-To: rpp@mail2.ietf.org Delivered-To: rpp@mail2.ietf.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D1C11D24E01 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 02:03:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1784797388; bh=qdUr26578rMvrrMjrOIQ//rSfvbH5eZZhj+y3CvaiLk=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:Cc:From:In-Reply-To; b=KBE9dts8W6PtZ6KOsUmHaLOX6Zk4ljhmlK9Xc0SnX5b8LZfTHDOO9GdHBvX1yq249 MT5FStQyhO7UQfyqy6TaGHfC320Pyynd51iDjoyKKuFHHtjZ3sfxEFx7+jDFdq0yc6 w08x4rAC18kf7N0FJrNQ3iv4pBY7/nRRcUEVvzyY= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iit.cnr.it Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yd07qro1JqEI for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 02:03:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx5.iit.cnr.it (mx5.iit.cnr.it [146.48.58.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 265CC11D24D8E for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 02:03:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx5.iit.cnr.it D11C0C14FF DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iit.cnr.it; s=mx520231221; t=1784797378; bh=qdUr26578rMvrrMjrOIQ//rSfvbH5eZZhj+y3CvaiLk=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:Cc:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ofmqyd0ub95MM1+O1y56dG9qpgNMVoJa8oPN1EPnYsw/x9BzpC/KCcJjeJxLnFojJ MLnmN/y9dZ9OM52UbjxYLFM261BVjAtfvQRkKCignnHQzJXl6er2ErleovZR/uC5S5 X968+wOt6fyXhR4RGEAa8ilQy64Ney5HrPox2Pyl1G1zBVK6h6aGrK+NGb2ErE3ZP+ /fF+pV90I6jN3ngtoZjOdnkyeIGs1kS6cz9WV1UBXNyNpEG60b1ftQfCyJPPALj65q SWpwFBv3K5PQh4cFvLcU1HvHeq1WCvDnMbJF4hMidyFE0mx6H++LAd7Gwr38oqU6IB 3X+xuiOg0AEVQ== Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx5.iit.cnr.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11C0C14FF; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:02:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx5.iit.cnr.it Received: from mx5.iit.cnr.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx5.iit.cnr.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10028) with ESMTP id 2ErUfy5-GGVX; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:02:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Relay-Autenticated: yes Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:02:17 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: it To: rpp@ietf.org References: <64441C24-5894-40FF-A3C6-B76234F287DD@sidn.nl> From: Mario Loffredo In-Reply-To: <64441C24-5894-40FF-A3C6-B76234F287DD@sidn.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID-Hash: JJODZGGPJ42R772BQTPE26IDDR3G7OKS X-Message-ID-Hash: JJODZGGPJ42R772BQTPE26IDDR3G7OKS X-MailFrom: mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: Robert Stepanek X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6 Precedence: list Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5Brpp=5D_Re=3A_Partial_Updates?= List-Id: "This list discusses a provisioning protocol based on RESTful principles and corresponding data representations using JSON." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi Maarten, my contribution to this dicusssion mirrors what Robert and I did in=20 JSContact to solve the same problem: 1) Prefer maps to arrays for representing collections, and limit the use=20 of arrays to cases where order is important or the elements of the=20 collection are not objects (typically strings). 2) Patch the entire array rather than single elements. Best, Mario Il 22/07/2026 18:55, Maarten Wullink ha scritto: > Hi, > > During the rpp session here in Vienna, we presented a proposal for usin= g an extended version of JSON Patch for partial updates in RPP. > The extension is described by Rule 28 in draft-ietf-rpp-json-00, and is= applicable only to updating arrays. > > we need feedback from the wg, is this the way to go? if not do you have= alternate proposal? > > see: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rpp-json-00#name-= partial > > - > Maarten > > > > _______________________________________________ > rpp mailing list -- rpp@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to rpp-leave@ietf.org --=20 Dott. Mario Loffredo Senior Technologist Technological Unit =E2=80=9CDigital Innovation=E2=80=9D Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT) National Research Council (CNR) Address: Via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy Phone: +39.0503153497 Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo