[rpp] Re: New Version Notification for draft-kowalik-rpp-data-objects-03.txt

[Pawel Kowalik <[e-mail]>]

Hi Pierre,

On 03.03.26 14:30, Pierre Thierry wrote:
> Le 02/03/2026 à 23:01, Pawel Kowalik a écrit :
>> - is this draft the right place to describe business logic (example 
>> RGP in 2.5.5.)? If not, where?
>
> Maybe it's a similar question: should RPP provide stricter types than 
> "String" with subsets of Unicode code points from RFC 9839 or PRECIS, 
> or should it let invalid strings be dealt with on another layer?
>
Yes it should. We have noted an issue to have 2nd pass on data elements 
once we have all the elements in the document in the right structure.

https://github.com/pawel-kow/draft-kowalik-rpp-data-objects/issues/43

> I saw that RPP Architecture 5.2.3 says there will be descriptions 
> using a schema language, will they go in the Data Objects documents? 
> (that could be that other layer where proper restrictions are expressed)
>
Take a look into draft-wullink-rpp-json-01. This one maps artefacts from 
data objects into JSON and JSON Schemas. It's not yet complete but 
you'll get the idea.

Kind regards,
Pawel