Re: [RPSEC] BGP Security Requirements v08

At 10:46 PM -0400 7/19/07, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
>In message <p06240505c2c52c906079@[128.89.89.71]>
>Stephen Kent writes:
>> 
>>  The ROA scheme has a specific purpose, i.e., allowing a resource
>>  holder to express an globally-verifiable authorization to originate a
>>  route to the holder's prefix(es). ROAs ought not be criticized for
>>  not doing something that they are not intended to do.
>> 
>>  Steve
>
>
>ROA should be criticized for a major ommission relative to an existing
>scheme it is expecting to replace.  But we're off topic.
>
>Curtis

Perhaps more accurately, we're talking about this in the wrong WG.

Steve

_______________________________________________
RPSEC mailing list
RPSEC@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec