Re: [RPSEC] BGP Security Requirements v08

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Wed, 11 July 2007 14:30 UTC

Return-path: <rpsec-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I8dCw-000867-7F; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:30:22 -0400
Received: from rpsec by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I8dCv-00085q-A8 for rpsec-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:30:21 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I8dCu-00085W-Us for rpsec@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:30:20 -0400
Received: from vapor.isi.edu ([128.9.64.64]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I8dCu-0001tU-Ht for rpsec@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:30:20 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.42] (pool-71-105-86-112.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.105.86.112]) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6BESoCT024700; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4694E91E.6040909@isi.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:28:46 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tony Tauber <ttauber@1-4-5.net>
Subject: Re: [RPSEC] BGP Security Requirements v08
References: <20070709142132.GF7635@1-4-5.net> <4694DE33.2080706@isi.edu> <20070711142015.GC27477@1-4-5.net>
In-Reply-To: <20070711142015.GC27477@1-4-5.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e8a67952aa972b528dd04570d58ad8fe
Cc: rpsec@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rpsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Protocol Security Requirements <rpsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>, <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/rpsec>
List-Post: <mailto:rpsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>, <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0687804019=="
Errors-To: rpsec-bounces@ietf.org

Hi, Tony,

I'd be glad to send text, since that might be a useful way forward.

Thanks!

Joe

Tony Tauber wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 06:42:11AM -0700, Joe Touch wrote:
>>
>>> Diff from last version:
>>>
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/rpsec/draft-ietf-rpsec-bgpsecrec/draft-ietf-rpsec-bgpsecrec-08-from-07.wdiff.html
>>>
>> I didn't see any changes related to the feedback I posted on the
>> transport protocol issues and GTSM. There are a number of current I-Ds
>> in this space that are not discussed, and any description that includes
>> the need for keying (SHOULD) might reconsider whether GTSM qualifies as
>> relevant at all in this space.
>>
>> Joe
> 
> Hi Joe,
> 
> I appreciate your comments and attention.  I tried to work these in with
> by making a couple of modest changes in what's now section 11.  GTSM is
> (and was) only mentioned in the doc by way of saying it's inadequate as
> a "solution".  If you feel strongly that more change is needed, send
> proposed text.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tony

_______________________________________________
RPSEC mailing list
RPSEC@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec