Re: [RPSEC] BGP Security Requirements v08

sandy@tislabs.com (Sandy Murphy) Fri, 13 July 2007 19:21 UTC

Return-path: <rpsec-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I9QhM-0006Ut-4K; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:21:04 -0400
Received: from rpsec by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I9QhK-0006Un-FG for rpsec-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:21:02 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I9QhK-0006Ue-5m for rpsec@ietf.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:21:02 -0400
Received: from ns1.tislabs.com ([192.94.214.100] helo=nutshell.tislabs.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I9QhF-0004BG-Uf for rpsec@ietf.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:21:02 -0400
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by nutshell.tislabs.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id l6DJIRrV015976; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:18:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pecan.tislabs.com(10.66.1.30) by nutshell.tislabs.com via csmap (V6.0) id srcAAABZaymF; Fri, 13 Jul 07 15:18:19 -0400
Received: by pecan.tislabs.com (Postfix, from userid 2005) id 0CCCB3F47A; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:16:25 -0400 (EDT)
To: rpsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [RPSEC] BGP Security Requirements v08
In-Reply-To: <200707131632.l6DGW1b3021820@harbor.brookfield.occnc.com>
Message-Id: <20070713191625.0CCCB3F47A@pecan.tislabs.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:16:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: sandy@tislabs.com (Sandy Murphy)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab
Cc: rcallon@juniper.net, dward@cisco.com, psavola@funet.fi
X-BeenThere: rpsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Protocol Security Requirements <rpsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>, <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/rpsec>
List-Post: <mailto:rpsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>, <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: rpsec-bounces@ietf.org

>So we seem to be in violent agreement about the difference between
>crypto solutions and DOS solutions.
>...
>draft-behringer-bgp-session-sec-req-01.txt cites rfc4593

There is also Pekka Savola's draft, draft-savola-rtgwg-backbone-attacks-03.txt
which talks about the various attacks on routing infrastructure in
ISP backbones, the various countermeasures, and speaks briefly
about where each type of countermeasure would be appropriate.

He talked about this work at several working groups in Jul 06,
including rpsec.  The presentations seemed to be generally well
received, and there was some discussion of where the work would
best be done.  But no wg seems to have picked it up as a wg item.

Should there be discussion of picking up both the behringer and
the savola drafts as wg items?

(Actually, the routing ADs may know more about the status of
the savola draft, so I've put them on the recipient list.)

--Sandy


_______________________________________________
RPSEC mailing list
RPSEC@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec