IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RPSEC] RPsec not meeting in Prague

Russ White <riw@cisco.com> Fri, 30 March 2007 17:44 UTC

Return-path: <rpsec-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HXL92-0005Xk-PB; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:44:12 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HXL91-0005Xe-89 for rpsec@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:44:11 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HXL8z-0005P6-V3 for rpsec@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:44:11 -0400
Received: from sj-dkim-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.79]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2007 10:44:10 -0700
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (sj-core-3.cisco.com [171.68.223.137]) by sj-dkim-5.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l2UHi9rF021203; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:44:09 -0700
Received: from [128.107.114.151] (dhcp-128-107-114-151.cisco.com [128.107.114.151]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l2UHi5A8018623; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:44:05 GMT
Message-ID: <460D4C66.2010802@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:44:06 -0400
From: Russ White <riw@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Macintosh/20070221)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sandy Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
Subject: Re: [RPSEC] RPsec not meeting in Prague
References: <20070309154203.EEA353F472@pecan.tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070309154203.EEA353F472@pecan.tislabs.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.3.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=794; t=1175276649; x=1176140649; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim5002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=riw@cisco.com; z=From:=20Russ=20White=20<riw@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[RPSEC]=20RPsec=20not=20meeting=20in=20Prague |Sender:=20; bh=M33GiYZz2EfCqewiNp0+wkg4dBDgcatDRC1t1kAeeQ4=; b=BBzkgjmnn2U1SXhrFo30X3d/l/fwCQs5MgN33nxvYSdIYRCFY4QaaE8on0z3FpTSeB+OYzMa 84qkElNdDSt0/bX46Q9uB3maPF1bQO1dL6ynm04J9h5Oq798giOngR0c;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-5; header.From=riw@cisco.com; dkim=pass (sig from cisco.com/sjdkim5002 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ea4ac80f790299f943f0a53be7e1a21a
Cc: rpsec@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rpsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Protocol Security Requirements <rpsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>, <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/rpsec>
List-Post: <mailto:rpsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>, <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: rpsec-bounces@ietf.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


I think we have a forthcoming draft on this.... I'm checking on it now.

:-)

Russ

Sandy Murphy wrote:
>> Some other stuff has come up I need to attend to, so I've canceled my
>> trip to Prague.
> 
> Are you canceling the rpsec meeting in Prague?
> 
> I think there are decisions that can't wait until Chicago.  I'm
> thinking of the draft charter item about establishing requirements
> for the BGP link protection, and it's relationship to the work
> going on as we speak in tcpm.
> 
> --Sandy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGDUxmER27sUhU9OQRAhDqAKDFWwJ6uSZV4aKxbO+fMFwrw2QG8QCg2RCA
yygJkaHKjrB2nIv5bvcSirU=
=rtlO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
RPSEC mailing list
RPSEC@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email