IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RPSEC] BGP Security Requirements v08

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Tue, 17 July 2007 14:02 UTC

Return-path: <rpsec-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IAndb-0002fw-Lw; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:02:51 -0400
Received: from rpsec by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IAndX-0002X6-PU for rpsec-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:02:47 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IAndX-0002Wt-FS for rpsec@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:02:47 -0400
Received: from mx11.bbn.com ([128.33.0.80]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IAndU-0000PM-8Z for rpsec@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:02:47 -0400
Received: from dhcp89-089-071.bbn.com ([128.89.89.71]) by mx11.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1IAndT-0001Mb-54; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:02:43 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p0624050fc2c27b16cdbf@[128.89.89.71]>
In-Reply-To: <469C270F.6030102@apnic.net>
References: <200707140126.l6E1QwYZ061559@harbor.brookfield.occnc.com> <469C270F.6030102@apnic.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:57:14 -0400
To: Robert Loomans <robertl@apnic.net>
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Subject: Re: [RPSEC] BGP Security Requirements v08
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
Cc: rpsec@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rpsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Protocol Security Requirements <rpsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>, <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/rpsec>
List-Post: <mailto:rpsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>, <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: rpsec-bounces@ietf.org

At 12:18 PM +1000 7/17/07, Robert Loomans wrote:
>...
>
>Curtis, Stephen, please correct me if I'm mis-characterising your
>opinions...
>
>Curtis, you seem to be saying that passing on the information via
>non-supporting routers is better than nothing, and so should definitely
>be done.
>
>Stephen, you appear to be saying that it might be found to be pointless
>or, in fact, worse than useless (ie, actively harmful), and don't want
>to be committed to doing so this early in the game.
>
>Is that correct?
>
>Rob
>

Rob,

yes, that's a good, concise characterization of my position.

Steve


_______________________________________________
RPSEC mailing list
RPSEC@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email