Re: [RPSEC] RPsec not meeting in Prague

sandy@tislabs.com (Sandy Murphy) Fri, 09 March 2007 15:45 UTC

Return-path: <rpsec-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HPhHR-0007bJ-7l; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 10:45:17 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HPhHP-0007b9-SI for rpsec@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 10:45:15 -0500
Received: from nutshell.tislabs.com ([192.94.214.100]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HPhHO-0000ge-Ff for rpsec@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 10:45:15 -0500
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by nutshell.tislabs.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id l29FhRuq008300; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:43:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pecan.tislabs.com(10.66.1.30) by nutshell.tislabs.com via csmap (V6.0) id srcAAA5Xayfq; Fri, 9 Mar 07 10:42:47 -0500
Received: by pecan.tislabs.com (Postfix, from userid 2005) id EEA353F472; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:42:03 -0500 (EST)
To: riw@cisco.com, rpsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [RPSEC] RPsec not meeting in Prague
In-Reply-To: <45F16F9F.3020201@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <20070309154203.EEA353F472@pecan.tislabs.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:42:03 -0500 (EST)
From: sandy@tislabs.com (Sandy Murphy)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89
Cc: sandy@tislabs.com
X-BeenThere: rpsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Protocol Security Requirements <rpsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>, <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/rpsec>
List-Post: <mailto:rpsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>, <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: rpsec-bounces@ietf.org

>Some other stuff has come up I need to attend to, so I've canceled my
>trip to Prague.

Are you canceling the rpsec meeting in Prague?

I think there are decisions that can't wait until Chicago.  I'm
thinking of the draft charter item about establishing requirements
for the BGP link protection, and it's relationship to the work
going on as we speak in tcpm.

--Sandy

_______________________________________________
RPSEC mailing list
RPSEC@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec