IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RPSEC] BGP Security Requirements v08

sandy@tislabs.com (Sandy Murphy) Wed, 11 July 2007 14:54 UTC

Return-path: <rpsec-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I8daG-0000Ye-LU; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:54:28 -0400
Received: from rpsec by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I8daF-0000YU-7b for rpsec-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:54:27 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I8daE-0000YM-Tp for rpsec@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:54:26 -0400
Received: from nutshell.tislabs.com ([192.94.214.100]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I8dZz-0002Nf-Kd for rpsec@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:54:26 -0400
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by nutshell.tislabs.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id l6BEq329001766; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:52:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pecan.tislabs.com(10.66.1.30) by nutshell.tislabs.com via csmap (V6.0) id srcAAAq1aOld; Wed, 11 Jul 07 10:51:04 -0400
Received: by pecan.tislabs.com (Postfix, from userid 2005) id DCA653F47C; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:49:08 -0400 (EDT)
To: riw@cisco.com, sandy@tislabs.com
Subject: Re: [RPSEC] BGP Security Requirements v08
In-Reply-To: <4694ED10.4030503@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <20070711144908.DCA653F47C@pecan.tislabs.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:49:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: sandy@tislabs.com (Sandy Murphy)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aefe408d50e9c7c47615841cb314bed
Cc: rpsec@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rpsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Protocol Security Requirements <rpsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>, <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/rpsec>
List-Post: <mailto:rpsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>, <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: rpsec-bounces@ietf.org

>So, I would say it's not an "all or nothing" affair, and retaining
>information through a non-supporting AS is useful.

I agree.  I already said that, but I just wanted to be sure my comment
about caution did not indicate I had changed my mind.

--Sandy


_______________________________________________
RPSEC mailing list
RPSEC@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email