IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RPSEC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-rpsec-bgp-session-sec-req-00.txt

"Michael H. Behringer" <mbehring@cisco.com> Thu, 13 December 2007 21:35 UTC

Return-path: <rpsec-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J2vi1-0002d6-I5; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:35:09 -0500
Received: from rpsec by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J2vi0-0002cz-Qr for rpsec-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:35:08 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J2vi0-0002cq-H4 for rpsec@ietf.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:35:08 -0500
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.140]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J2vhy-0002cf-A0 for rpsec@ietf.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:35:08 -0500
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.24,163,1196636400"; d="scan'208";a="850590"
Received: from ams-dkim-2.cisco.com ([144.254.224.139]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Dec 2007 22:35:05 +0100
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id lBDLZ509026588; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:35:05 +0100
Received: from xbh-ams-332.emea.cisco.com (xbh-ams-332.cisco.com [144.254.231.87]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id lBDLZ5mc012408; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:35:05 GMT
Received: from xfe-ams-332.cisco.com ([144.254.231.73]) by xbh-ams-332.emea.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:35:05 +0100
Received: from mbehring-wxp.cisco.com ([10.55.2.210]) by xfe-ams-332.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:35:04 +0100
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:34:46 +0100
To: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>, rpsec@ietf.org
From: "Michael H. Behringer" <mbehring@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [RPSEC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-rpsec-bgp-session-sec-req-00.txt
In-Reply-To: <4761877F.6060504@isi.edu>
References: <4761877F.6060504@isi.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-ID: <XFE-AMS-332jCRGryWt00000206@xfe-ams-332.cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Dec 2007 21:35:04.0843 (UTC) FILETIME=[064F95B0:01C83DD0]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=824; t=1197581705; x=1198445705; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=mbehring@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Michael=20H.=20Behringer=22=20<mbehring@cisco.c om> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[RPSEC]=20I-D=0A=20=20Action=3Adraft-ie tf-rpsec-bgp-session-sec-req-00.txt |Sender:=20; bh=QCjXHPcYzvXksVn+wxg/Dew/6PY0nDrsGtTJTHSgGz8=; b=UfYidclFUmCkRc/U14XceFls/2QVSAvgmjQlac+FzeQJtvz2qpyvIpDtAk Iw9VhLHnyxiyMm09WPLfe/GOpOyIcnrYUUmUf2nuzqRAeJJ62KPzYXX7LReC zkABt9IDIZ;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-2; header.From=mbehring@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim2001 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3
Cc:
X-BeenThere: rpsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Protocol Security Requirements <rpsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>, <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/rpsec>
List-Post: <mailto:rpsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>, <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: rpsec-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Joe, 

Thanks a lot for the feedback, this is very useful! The currently posted draft is the same version as before, just as a WG draft, so a lot of the feedback received is not actually in the document yet. 

I'll do all the updates, and post a -01 version. 

Michael

At 20:26 13/12/2007, Joe Touch wrote:
>It would be useful to update this doc's discussion of TCP MD5 and its
>successors with respect to work in the TCPM WG reported in Vancouver, in
>particular:
>
>- there is a newer version of Bellovin's ID
>
>- the TCPM ID on TCP-AO supercedes Ron's and is the intended replacement
>to TCP MD5; I believe Ron's has been withdrawn at this point
>
>Joe
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>RPSEC mailing list
>RPSEC@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec


_______________________________________________
RPSEC mailing list
RPSEC@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email