[RPSEC] Feedback on draft-behringer-bgp-session-req-01
Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Thu, 21 June 2007 20:34 UTC
Return-path: <rpsec-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1I1TMH-0001tN-6l; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:34:25 -0400
Received: from rpsec by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1I1TMG-0001tC-IQ
for rpsec-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:34:24 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I1TMG-0001sz-8h
for rpsec@ietf.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:34:24 -0400
Received: from vapor.isi.edu ([128.9.64.64])
by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I1TMF-0006KC-RX
for rpsec@ietf.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:34:24 -0400
Received: from [75.215.104.154] (154.sub-75-215-104.myvzw.com [75.215.104.154])
by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5LKXwPg004356;
Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <467AE0B5.2080104@isi.edu>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:33:57 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rpsec@ietf.org
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 25620135586de10c627e3628c432b04a
Subject: [RPSEC] Feedback on draft-behringer-bgp-session-req-01
X-BeenThere: rpsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Protocol Security Requirements <rpsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>,
<mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/rpsec>
List-Post: <mailto:rpsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>,
<mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0505754276=="
Errors-To: rpsec-bounces@ietf.org
Hi, all, The following feedback was requested on the TCPM's TCP-AUTH-DT (TCP-Auth design team) mailing list. TCP-Auth is TCMP's work towards an update to TCP-MD5, based on two current proposals (noted below). Joe --------------------------------------------- This document appears to overlap ongoing work in TCPM to characterize concerns with using TCP-MD5 to secure BGP, and use of alternatives. E.g., draft-ietf-tcpm-antispoof. The TCP-Auth team is currently workiing to revise draft-bellovin-tcpsec, and an update to that should be out shortly. Some additional comments: Sec 1 - the OSI stack is not the reference model for the Internet. GTSM is not IP layer security; it is a heuristic that checks TTLs in IP packets, and assumes that there is other security protecting tunnels to a host. It would be more appropriate to cite IPsec as IP security, and GTSM as "other protection mechanisms". Other work in this area: - draft-ietf-tcpm-antispoof (as noted above) - draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure - draft-bellovin-tcpsposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGeuCxE5f5cImnZrsRAjj5AJ9LkE9b0IfDPmwrp3JZszFdT9CmOwCfUdXs EqO9ZGajzAhkXX9gRS7YlzU=W+V3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigCD0E0DBCDB6BA044BC9AE154-- --=======17995109= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ RPSEC mailing list RPSEC@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec --=======17995109=--
- [RPSEC] Feedback on draft-behringer-bgp-session-r… Joe Touch
- RE: [RPSEC] Feedback on draft-behringer-bgp-sessi… Barry Greene (bgreene)
- Re: [RPSEC] Feedback on draft-behringer-bgp-sessi… Joe Touch
- Re: [RPSEC] Feedback on draft-behringer-bgp-sessi… Stephen Kent
- Re: [RPSEC] Feedback on draft-behringer-bgp-sessi… Ron Bonica