Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt
David Waitzman <djw@bbn.com> Wed, 04 January 1995 16:27 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04128; 4 Jan 95 11:27 EST
Received: from [132.151.1.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04124; 4 Jan 95 11:27 EST
Received: from venera.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01452; 4 Jan 95 11:27 EST
Received: from MORPHEUS.BBN.COM by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-20) id <AA00487>; Wed, 4 Jan 1995 07:21:27 -0800
Message-Id: <199501041521.AA00487@venera.isi.edu>
To: kasten@ftp.com
Cc: rreq@isi.edu
Subject: Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 04 Jan 95 08:23:10 -0500. <9501041323.AA03592@mailserv-D.ftp.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 1995 10:21:32 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: David Waitzman <djw@bbn.com>
> i do not believe that it is appropriate to make a requirement > 'temporally conditional' in this manner. at this point in time, > either v2 is ready to be required in r.r. or it is not. if it is > ready and if we think it is the right thing to do then we should > mandate it. if it is not ready then it is not ready and we should > wait for it to be ready. V2's security features address a critical need for securely managing routers. Some routers are already shipping with proposed-standard v2 (ex. cisco version 10.2). I think that this is a case where having r.r. conditionally leading a bit will help make it more applicable in the long term. Are you worried about what happened with CMOT standardization? -david
- ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt Fred Baker
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt David Waitzman
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt David Waitzman
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt bmanning
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt bmanning
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt Robert Elz
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt Scott Bradner
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt Scott Bradner
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt Bill Manning
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt Bill Manning
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt Mike O'Dell
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt Frank Kastenholz
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt Frank Kastenholz
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt Frank Kastenholz
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt Robert Elz
- ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt Craig A. Finseth
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt David Waitzman
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt barns
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt Marshall Rose
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt David Waitzman
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt David Waitzman
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt David Waitzman
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt bmanning
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt Louis A. Mamakos
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt David Waitzman
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt barns
- Re: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-03.txt bmanning