ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/draft-ietf-rreq-cidr-03.txt
Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Wed, 05 April 1995 12:19 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01669; 5 Apr 95 8:19 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01665; 5 Apr 95 8:19 EDT
Received: from venera.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04223; 5 Apr 95 8:19 EDT
Received: from stilton.cisco.com by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-21) id <AA02521>; Wed, 5 Apr 1995 05:00:27 -0700
Received: from [171.69.126.218] (sl-charm-11.cisco.com [171.69.126.149]) by stilton.cisco.com (8.6.8+c/8.6.5) with SMTP id FAA03600; Wed, 5 Apr 1995 05:00:13 -0700
X-Sender: fred@stilton.cisco.com
Message-Id: <v02110104aba83241b4de@[171.69.126.218]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 1995 05:00:20 -0700
To: jhalpern@newbridge.com
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/draft-ietf-rreq-cidr-03.txt
Cc: scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, internet-drafts@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, rreq@isi.edu, Bill Manning <bmanning@isi.edu>
At 8:06 PM 4/3/95, Bill Manning wrote: > Fred will post the revised wording this week to the archives. > We believe that with this minor change, the IESG should affirm this > draft and advance it to proposed standard at the end of the current > Last Call. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Please consider the above-named document to contain changes made persuant to the last call notice for Router Requirements; post the draft and ask theIESG to consider it for Proposed Standard. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= The change: 15,17c15,17 < 30 March 1995 < Document Revision 2.06 | < draft-ietf-rreq-cidr-02.txt --- > 5 April 1995 > Document Revision 2.07 | > draft-ietf-rreq-cidr-03.txt | 19c19 < 3/30/95 | --- > 4/3/95 | 70c70 < This document will expire before 5 Oct. 1995. --- > This document will expire before 10 Oct. 1995. 80,81c80,81 < possible. Please also mention the date of this draft | < (3/30/95) and the revision level (2.06). --- > possible. Please also mention the date of this draft (4/3/95) | > and the revision level (2.07). 9840,9842c9840,9845 < default to off. The router SHOULD require a password or < other valid authentication before permitting remote < reconfiguration. --- > default to off. The router SHOULD require valid | > authentication before permitting remote reconfiguration. | > This authentication procedure SHOULD NOT transmit the | > authentication secret over the network. For example, if | > telnet is implemented, the vendor SHOULD IMPLEMENT | > Kerberos, S-Key, or a similar authentication procedure. stilton(12): =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= computers run on smoke, it if leaks out they won't run