Re: source route reversal

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Fri, 03 February 1995 11:15 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01277; 3 Feb 95 6:15 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01273; 3 Feb 95 6:15 EST
Received: from venera.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02688; 3 Feb 95 6:15 EST
Received: from stilton.cisco.com by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-20) id <AA07766>; Fri, 3 Feb 1995 02:58:00 -0800
Received: from [198.92.24.2] (fred-mac-fr.cisco.com [198.92.24.2]) by stilton.cisco.com (8.6.8+c/8.6.5) with SMTP id CAA18402; Fri, 3 Feb 1995 02:57:56 -0800
X-Sender: fred@stilton.cisco.com
Message-Id: <v02110117ab57b10c25ec@[198.92.24.2]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 1995 02:57:57 -0800
To: Tony Li <tli@cisco.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: source route reversal
Cc: rreq@isi.edu

At 11:29 AM 2/2/95, Tony Li wrote:
>- If the node is unaware of outbound policy constraints, then the node
>  MUST reverse the source route.
>- If the node is aware of outbound policy constraints then the node is
>  free to return the packet using appropriate mechanisms within the
>  bounds of those constraints.

OK

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Top Ten Reasons Santa Didn't Come in '94
   ...
 6. The sleigh has an "Intel Inside" sticker on it. 'Nuff said.