Re: RREQ draft
Fred Baker <email@example.com> Thu, 01 December 1994 02:16 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15671;
30 Nov 94 21:16 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15667; 30 Nov 94 21:16 EST
Received: from venera.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21887; 30 Nov 94 21:16 EST
Received: from nacho.cisco.com by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-19) id <AA14388>; Wed, 30 Nov 1994 17:24:41 -0800
Received: from [220.127.116.11] (sj-f-2-dyn20.cisco.com [18.104.22.168]) by nacho.cisco.com (8.6.8+c/CISCO.SERVER.1.1) with SMTP id RAA07668; Wed, 30 Nov 1994 17:24:25 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 1994 17:24:34 -0800
To: Bill Manning <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Fred Baker <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: RREQ draft
At 4:45 PM 12/1/94, Bill Manning wrote: > I note that this has Phil's name as author. This should be fixed. > Also, it peters out at page 202; no real good closure. Or did I > screw up on this (I know, your busy w/ RSVP and flows and more fun > stuff :) I'm about to post ftp://ftp.cisco.com/fred/rreq-01.txt (draft 2.01). I will suggest that we take comments on that version, not 1.50. Frank pointed out a number of formatting bloopers that make it pretty hard to read. I'll have it up by tomorrow morning. ============================================================================= If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room!