Re: net directed broadcasts
Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 29 December 1994 18:48 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05325; 29 Dec 94 13:48 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05321; 29 Dec 94 13:48 EST
Received: from venera.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13556; 29 Dec 94 13:48 EST
Received: from stilton.cisco.com by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-20) id <AA27957>; Thu, 29 Dec 1994 10:16:43 -0800
Received: from [171.69.126.178] (sl-chanty-05.cisco.com [171.69.126.159]) by stilton.cisco.com (8.6.8+c/CISCO.SERVER.1.1) with SMTP id KAA17833; Thu, 29 Dec 1994 10:15:06 -0800
X-Sender: fred@stilton.cisco.com
Message-Id: <v0211010cab28ab9383c5@[171.69.126.178]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 1994 10:15:20 -0800
To: stev@ftp.com
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: net directed broadcasts
Cc: rreq@isi.edu
>boy, fred, this does take me back. this seems like the correct course to
>take. are you going to mention not allowing it by default?
that's already the case.
=============================================================================
It's hardest to find the real answer when you already know what it is
- net directed broadcasts Fred Baker
- Re: net directed broadcasts stev
- Re: net directed broadcasts Fred Baker