Formal Document Review

bmanning@isi.edu Tue, 13 December 1994 16:38 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04244; 13 Dec 94 11:38 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04240; 13 Dec 94 11:37 EST
Received: from venera.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08056; 13 Dec 94 11:37 EST
Received: from zed.isi.edu by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-19) id <AA09814>; Tue, 13 Dec 1994 08:10:24 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: bmanning@isi.edu
Posted-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 1994 08:08:53 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199412131608.AA23871@zed.isi.edu>
Received: by zed.isi.edu (5.65c/4.0.3-4) id <AA23871>; Tue, 13 Dec 1994 08:08:53 -0800
Subject: Formal Document Review
To: rreq@isi.edu
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 1994 08:08:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 349

> 	Was there any discussion about how to review Fred's document?
> If not, any ideas?  It would seem like a good idea to have some level
> of community by-in on the new document since it is to become a standards
> track document.
> 

	Scott Bradner forwarded this excellent sugestion. 

	Ideas on how to review this document are encouraged.

--bill