Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation

Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net> Sat, 10 November 2012 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <danny@tcb.net>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A04D21F8566 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:23:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IpjmGVzwEDg7 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:23:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.friendswithtools.org (unknown [IPv6:2600:3000:150f:701:5054:ff:fed1:24a9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F8B21F855E for <rrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:23:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dspam (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.friendswithtools.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 507E120BA for <rrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 16:23:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.5.132] (ip-64-134-70-192.public.wayport.net [64.134.70.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.friendswithtools.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF53120AE; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 09:22:57 -0700 (MST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>
In-Reply-To: <20121110032942.BD27018C113@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 11:23:12 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4C845B01-B282-46FB-A4B8-7ADDBCC9C6E5@tcb.net>
References: <20121110032942.BD27018C113@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
To: Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Processed: Sat Nov 10 09:23:00 2012
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 1.0000
X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 98689409 chance of being spam
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0023
X-DSPAM-Signature: 509e7f64199631928769353
X-DSPAM-Factors: 27, their+#+#+certainly, 0.40000, global+routing, 0.40000, order+#+#+#+smart, 0.40000, had+#+#+has, 0.40000, to+#+to, 0.40000, per+#+#+#+of, 0.40000, signing+#+of, 0.40000, in+short, 0.40000, always+#+and, 0.40000, and+#+#+#+updates, 0.40000, it+No, 0.40000, PM+Noel, 0.40000, BGPSEC+#+and, 0.40000, of+#+#+#+here, 0.40000, Mime-Version*Message+#+v1283, 0.40000, perspective+#+#+#+of, 0.40000, periodic+#+#+per, 0.40000, things+#+#+updates, 0.40000, replace+#+#+#+I, 0.40000, nothing+has, 0.40000, Subject*Re+#+#+#+hibernation, 0.40000, extensions+#+things, 0.40000, we+#+#+BGPSEC, 0.40000, replacement+#+#+order, 0.40000, nothing+#+#+#+to, 0.40000, proposed+to, 0.40000, BGPSEC+#+#+things, 0.40000
Cc: rrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 16:23:01 -0000

On Nov 9, 2012, at 10:29 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote:

> 
> We still have the same old kludgy BGP global routing system we always had,
> and _nothing_ has been proposed to improve/replace it.

No, but I suspect if we bolt on BGPSEC extensions and things like "periodic updates" and per router signing & validation of updates, we're going to need to work on a replacement in short order.

Some of the smart folks here applying their perspective would certainly be of value, methinks.

-danny